From: Alexander Wilhelm <alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] soc: qcom: extend interface for big endian support
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:34:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXCrxXvHCUhvhONe@FUE-ALEWI-WINX> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sc57szhtetjs5b2xbudbib2dkaspek6eohviy5ab4po66e3oz4@zhlfb2c4avc3>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 11:27:35AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 10:07:22AM +0100, Alexander Wilhelm wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:22:07AM +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:
> > > On 19/11/2025 11:40, Alexander Wilhelm wrote:
> > > > Currently, the QMI interface only works on little endian systems due to how
> > > > it encodes and decodes data. Most QMI related data structures are defined
> > > > in CPU native order and do not use endian specific types.
> > > >
> > > > Add support for endian conversion of basic element types in the QMI
> > > > encoding and decoding logic. Fix the handling of QMI_DATA_LEN fields to
> > > > ensure correct interpretation on big endian systems. These changes are
> > > > required to allow QMI to operate correctly across architectures with
> > > > different endianness.
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I recently (next-20260119) started receiving errors on Pixel 3:
> > >
> > > [ 21.158943] ipa 1e40000.ipa: received modem running event
> > > [ 21.164616] qmi_encode: Invalid data length
> > > [ 21.168930] qcom_q6v5_pas remoteproc-adsp: failed to send subsystem event
> > > [ 21.175844] qmi_encode: Invalid data length
> > > [ 21.180494] qcom_q6v5_pas remoteproc-cdsp: failed to send subsystem event
> > > [ 21.187467] qmi_encode: Invalid data length
> > > [ 21.191772] qcom-q6v5-mss 4080000.remoteproc: failed to send subsystem
> > > event
> > > [ 21.199088] qmi_encode: Invalid data length
> > > [ 21.203360] qcom-q6v5-mss 4080000.remoteproc: failed to send subsystem
> > > event
> > > [ 21.210636] remoteproc remoteproc0: remote processor 4080000.remoteproc
> > > is now up
> > >
> > > Since it's not well tested, I believe there could be problem with
> > > configuration, but after reverting this series, no errors pop up.
> > >
> > > I would believe maybe these errors was previously hidden, but just to be
> > > sure asking here.
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > This is exactly the problem I was afraid of. When the endianness fixes for
> > `ath12k` were rejected, I implemented them in the QMI subsystem instead. I only
> > tested this with `ath11k` and `ath12k` drivers, both on little-endian and
> > big-endian platforms. However, other devices, such as your modem, also rely on
> > QMI, but were not tested.
> >
> > The difference now is that, instead of using memcpy, basic elements like `u8`,
> > `u16`, `u32`, and `u64` are handled explicitly in separate switch-cases. This
> > raises the question of what exactly the modem and its corresponding driver are
> > doing at this point. Could you please tell me which repository you are working
> > on? I could not find `next-20260119` in either the `ath` or the `stable`
> > repositories.
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/?h=next-20260119__;!!I9LPvj3b!AWVWfTEAVZO1j_Z284kxYiMwiOLbmHWEDT8S0RRsUl2rXclrmeyzh9ChVTTXMlhjPLcoRAiuS7Zfx9c0ejF_6IDNCNmVGYaDZmw95gOh$
Thanks, Dmitry.
@David:
OK, this is interesting. The QMI subsystem supports exactly the
basic element types from u8 to u64. In your output, I don’t see any errors
like “Unrecognized element size”. Therefore, I assume that the modem is
adhering correctly to the QMI protocol conventions.
The “Invalid data length” error can only occur if `data_len_value <= 0` or
if `temp_ei->elem_len < data_len_value`. However, my changes should not
affect this. Since you are using a Pixel 3, I assume this is a
little-endian platform. Even if your modem performs any endian swapping
internally, this should not affect you.
Unfortunately, I must have overlooked something, I can’t identify the
problem just by reading the code. Without having access to the specific
modem, I’m also unable to debug this properly. As a fallback, you could
revert the changes and drop big-endian support for now. At the moment, I
can’t provide an alternative solution on short notice.
Best regards
Alexander Wilhelm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-21 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-19 10:40 [PATCH v5 0/3] soc: qcom: extend interface for big endian support Alexander Wilhelm
2025-11-19 10:40 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] soc: qcom: check QMI basic element error codes Alexander Wilhelm
2025-11-19 10:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] soc: qcom: fix QMI encoding/decoding for basic elements Alexander Wilhelm
2025-11-19 10:40 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] soc: qcom: preserve CPU endianness for QMI_DATA_LEN Alexander Wilhelm
2026-01-16 21:39 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] soc: qcom: extend interface for big endian support Bjorn Andersson
2026-01-21 8:22 ` David Heidelberg
2026-01-21 9:07 ` Alexander Wilhelm
2026-01-21 9:27 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-01-21 10:34 ` Alexander Wilhelm [this message]
2026-01-27 13:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-02-14 19:26 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-03-09 10:30 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-03-09 10:42 ` Alexander Wilhelm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXCrxXvHCUhvhONe@FUE-ALEWI-WINX \
--to=alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox