From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49DA434DB7B; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761146822; cv=none; b=k14PeJnC2mlirWIqxrDPlpN+XbQW3R7fDImLbgKCbl6k21JmuY+9hNw9XkcC2YNNdBC49Q8TtMzU0ig/IYnhqnWS/YxPs+JAdWGQOw3xRpAZCQhvISpQyQBMj94BnnzHe6YXwVdQHsuqSsNqxzLzjnPxTdBPrV9ji3p6v3RbbtE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761146822; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bUoTM94QLd9d0HTYl5mwzw/8e+747g5nj7s+u5lmBJI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cFuNowBimOf6CH1FTg/PvC9D055nXgRlSolY4sup+uNnKaVAiYzlVFQGZXQP7sun6Q1ysP/htjz+GPTpBhpK1bw4gyoknYc95Ze2iqhTBI708VDYlbo2MHvwnm9R5NWVZWK6LWN3oHgcIn+EcnHjwOyZ7IwvPUSTjlSXoZhEQ0Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=HevB38EV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="HevB38EV" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279870.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 59MA8v0w026228; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:26:52 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh= atGzeSNsSmCje4O3zL4YfsN2MYoBMAJOySsMeFbHhOk=; b=HevB38EVnno9BExi +txJ/CSAl1QPymmGdlNgWyo4y73zs0PkGvRadWicX7KSWylarS0Do/hernFXSptb D12Qjjr+gFrctrlcQKVhlu6B6a4968RcMvmNqccXRW9EaW37TIlN1YjDBX1kttrz cmilTvBBwCscOrl4Cv0rxDLzikExioWWc6BnaHhjjE7SEqpx5ueMU9Pujotnqu5F o3Bpss9aAQebcTXPDqC/kwg9Rtsw981O+08p8qdKST+d/QSKm1esE5WHYxGXVeSU ecKxqx4C9Nq7wmpF/r7FjErvMNQmTymXRfFttbBle7Mfca+E0kjTxToEaXvWFYK5 DoJzew== Received: from nasanppmta03.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 49wsws7hky-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:26:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.52.223.231]) by NASANPPMTA03.qualcomm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 59MFQptB025783 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:26:51 GMT Received: from [10.50.62.229] (10.80.80.8) by nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.24; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 08:26:46 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:56:43 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: spi-qpic-snand: Add IPQ5424 compatible Content-Language: en-US To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mark Brown CC: , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20251014110534.480518-1-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com> <20251014110534.480518-2-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com> <96ae7d38-4ce0-fa34-e6f0-6bb6e4ceaa28@quicinc.com> <51c6871d-a125-4d76-adaf-d69d6628aa87@kernel.org> From: Md Sadre Alam In-Reply-To: <51c6871d-a125-4d76-adaf-d69d6628aa87@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMDIwMDE0OCBTYWx0ZWRfXx9R2lUypMDso Mjx1dfw57aKlIYETa6CdJt6MDK7eRBB+TQKTRQ/jxZF1aelijEB0AsgkV90wN3gkTJfNvA4AzrL rSXpbG7qctGPRKYP9QHsRztmwvm1mQWUMR/Zwa0ua6CfBEHYsO040hg7YKsCTg2mDIHRTle4uwu VkzTzISFMXB20qU361JEYObuG6E2kEsLM4PQcPx6WHPwLlS3Q7gdo8uEcrWnTEvdCgYehwlDo+Z PtI63BqIEwjBeSUsEXMntVTkpTm0fQQJaCGYWoMaMx1NTEF72wdUQJEbcpu70G2o5GO/wvVs63h AHXce1ip8PPKlHbdrP3/hrASQIbwckBsiDP7rlgw/UNuleDZsIAGPQnGxcvRVXT4DPreh74qeBa +vVzomeTKn3gE+efdexjbpXwbaIfkQ== X-Proofpoint-GUID: jmbJSYuuhAKyrgNwCyI7TJUUqoZ1iAag X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: jmbJSYuuhAKyrgNwCyI7TJUUqoZ1iAag X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=a+E9NESF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68f8f7bc cx=c_pps a=JYp8KDb2vCoCEuGobkYCKw==:117 a=JYp8KDb2vCoCEuGobkYCKw==:17 a=GEpy-HfZoHoA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x6icFKpwvdMA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=JgJbQ4Zy_J6bZbfwEwAA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=cPQSjfK2_nFv0Q5t_7PE:22 a=HhbK4dLum7pmb74im6QT:22 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=Ew2E2A-JSTLzCXPT_086:22 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-10-22_06,2025-10-13_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510020000 definitions=main-2510200148 Hi, On 10/22/2025 4:31 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 22/10/2025 08:59, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10/22/2025 12:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:35:26PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >>>> IPQ5424 contains the QPIC-SPI-NAND flash controller which is the same as >>>> the one found in IPQ9574. So let's document the IPQ5424 compatible and >>>> use IPQ9574 as the fallback. >>> >>> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. >> Thank you for the feedback. I’d appreciate a bit more clarity on what >> “doesn't apply against current code” refers to in this context. I’ve >> manually applied the patch against the latest mainline (torvalds/linux) > > > You can easily answer this by yourself. Did you send it to Torvalds? No. > You sent it to someone else, so why do you assume someone else manages > Torvalds' tree? Sorry about that — I’ll make sure to verify and align with the correct subsystem tree going forward. > >> and it applied cleanly without any conflicts. Please let me know if >> there’s a specific tree or integration point I should be checking against. > > > Please read submitting patches - it explains that. It also explains > where to find the tree. Thanks, I’ll go through Submitting Patches again and make sure I follow the right tree and workflow. Thanks, Alam.