From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@codeaurora.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, jh80.chung@samsung.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
georgi.djakov@linaro.org, alex.lemberg@sandisk.com,
mateusz.nowak@intel.com, Yuliy.Izrailov@sandisk.com,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, kdorfman@codeaurora.org,
david.griego@linaro.org, stummala@codeaurora.org,
venkatg@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Implement set_clock callback for sdhci-msm
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:37:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abd3da08-f74b-8a19-89c9-6fed4a99c9c9@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47795735-66ae-5382-77fa-7906833aada0@intel.com>
Hi Adrian,
On 8/22/2016 11:50 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 19/08/16 16:31, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 8/19/2016 6:34 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 19/08/16 07:36, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>>>> sdhci-msm controller may have different clk-rates for each
>>>> bus speed mode. Thus implement set_clock callback for
>>>> sdhci-msm driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@codeaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 103
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>>>> index 7c032c3..c0ad9c2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>>>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
>>>> struct mmc_host *mmc;
>>>> bool use_14lpp_dll_reset;
>>>> struct sdhci_msm_pltfm_data *pdata;
>>>> + u32 clk_rate;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> /* Platform specific tuning */
>>>> @@ -582,6 +583,106 @@ static unsigned int sdhci_msm_get_min_clock(struct
>>>> sdhci_host *host)
>>>> return msm_host->pdata->clk_table[0];
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static unsigned int sdhci_msm_get_msm_clk_rate(struct sdhci_host *host,
>>>> + u32 req_clk)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>>>> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>>>> + int count = msm_host->pdata->clk_table_sz;
>>>> + unsigned int sel_clk = -1;
>>>> + int cnt;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (req_clk < sdhci_msm_get_min_clock(host)) {
>>>> + sel_clk = sdhci_msm_get_min_clock(host);
>>>> + return sel_clk;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + for (cnt = 0; cnt < count; cnt++) {
>>>> + if (msm_host->pdata->clk_table[cnt] > req_clk) {
>>>> + break;
>>>> + } else if (msm_host->pdata->clk_table[cnt] == req_clk) {
>>>> + sel_clk = msm_host->pdata->clk_table[cnt];
>>>> + break;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + sel_clk = msm_host->pdata->clk_table[cnt];
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> 'else' is not needed after 'break' but can't this be simpler e.g.
>>>
>>> static unsigned int sdhci_msm_get_msm_clk_rate(struct sdhci_msm_host
>>> *msm_host, u32 req_clk)
>>> {
>>> int count = msm_host->pdata->clk_table_sz;
>>> unsigned int sel_clk = -1;
>>>
>>> while (count--) {
>>> sel_clk = msm_host->pdata->clk_table[count];
>>> if (req_clk >= sel_clk)
>>> return sel_clk;
>>> }
>>>
>>> return sel_clk;
>>> }
>>
>> Ok, sure I will check and get back on this.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> + return sel_clk;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> Blank line needed
>> Ok done.
>>
>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * __sdhci_msm_set_clock - sdhci_msm clock control.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Description:
>>>> + * Implement MSM version of sdhci_set_clock.
>>>> + * This is required since MSM controller does not
>>>> + * use internal divider and instead directly control
>>>> + * the GCC clock as per HW recommendation.
>>>> + **/
>>>> +void __sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u16 clk;
>>>> + unsigned long timeout;
>>>> +
>>>> + host->mmc->actual_clock = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + sdhci_writew(host, 0, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (clock == 0)
>>>> + return;
>>>
>>> Should set host->mmc->actual_clock to the actual rate somewhere.
>> Since MSM controller does not uses divider then there is no need of having
>> actual clock since it should be same as host->clock.
>
> Ok, so sdhci_msm_get_msm_clk_rate() is not the actual clock rate?
So I was assuming we need host->mmc->actual_clock rate if host->clock is
not the actual rate.
Ok, so I will update actual_clock to host->clock itself.
pls, let me know if any concerns.
>
>>
>> That's why I had kept it 0 intentionally. But I will add a comment
>> here then.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * MSM controller do not use clock divider.
>>>> + * Thus read SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL and only enable
>>>> + * clock with no divider value programmed.
>>>> + */
>>>> + clk = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>>>> +
>>>> + clk |= SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN;
>>>> + sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Wait max 20 ms */
>>>> + timeout = 20;
>>>> + while (!((clk = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL))
>>>> + & SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE)) {
>>>> + if (timeout == 0) {
>>>> + pr_err("%s: Internal clock never stabilised.\n",
>>>> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> + timeout--;
>>>> + mdelay(1);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + clk |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
>>>> + sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int
>>>> clock)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>>>> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
>>>> + u32 msm_clock = 0;
>>>> + int rc = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!clock)
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (clock != msm_host->clk_rate) {
>>>> + msm_clock = sdhci_msm_get_msm_clk_rate(host, clock);
>>>> + rc = clk_set_rate(msm_host->clk, msm_clock);
>>>> + if (rc) {
>>>> + pr_err("%s: failed to set clock at rate %u, requested clock
>>>> rate %u\n",
>>>> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), msm_clock, clock);
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>>> + msm_host->clk_rate = clock;
>>>> + pr_debug("%s: setting clock at rate %lu\n",
>>>> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), clk_get_rate(msm_host->clk));
>>>> + }
>>>> +out:
>>>> + __sdhci_msm_set_clock(host, clock);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static const struct of_device_id sdhci_msm_dt_match[] = {
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdhci-msm-v4" },
>>>> {},
>>>> @@ -592,7 +693,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_msm_dt_match);
>>>> static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_msm_ops = {
>>>> .platform_execute_tuning = sdhci_msm_execute_tuning,
>>>> .reset = sdhci_reset,
>>>> - .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
>>>> + .set_clock = sdhci_msm_set_clock,
>>>> .get_min_clock = sdhci_msm_get_min_clock,
>>>> .get_max_clock = sdhci_msm_get_max_clock,
>>>> .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-22 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-19 4:36 [PATCH v3 0/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add clk-rates and DDR support Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Change poor style writel/readl of registers Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 13:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Update DLL reset sequence Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 13:03 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: add pltfm_data support to get clk-rates from DT Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 13:03 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-19 13:36 ` Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-23 4:31 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-08-23 6:35 ` Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-24 16:56 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-08-25 6:03 ` Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Add clk-rates to sdhc1 & sdhc2 Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add get_min_clock() and get_max_clock() callback Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 13:03 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable few quirks Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 13:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Implement set_clock callback for sdhci-msm Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 13:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-19 13:31 ` Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-22 6:20 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-22 9:07 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2016-08-22 9:29 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-22 12:56 ` Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-23 13:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-23 13:39 ` Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add clock changes for DDR mode Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 13:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2016-08-19 13:26 ` Ritesh Harjani
2016-08-19 4:36 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Add ddr support to sdhc1 Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abd3da08-f74b-8a19-89c9-6fed4a99c9c9@codeaurora.org \
--to=riteshh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Yuliy.Izrailov@sandisk.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alex.lemberg@sandisk.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=david.griego@linaro.org \
--cc=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=kdorfman@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mateusz.nowak@intel.com \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=venkatg@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).