Re: [PATCH 1/2] mailbox: qcom-ipcc: amend qcom_ipcc_domain_map() to report errors

[Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 11:26:17AM +0100, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> Currently qcom_ipcc_domain_map() ignores errors returned by
> irq_set_chip_data() and invokes irq_set_chip_and_handler()
> that in turn ignores errors returned by irq_set_chip().
> This patch fixes both issues; no other functional changes
> are implemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
> index d957d989c0ce..c23efaaa64a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
> @@ -116,12 +116,20 @@ static struct irq_chip qcom_ipcc_irq_chip = {
>  static int qcom_ipcc_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
>  				irq_hw_number_t hw)
>  {
> +	int ret;
>  	struct qcom_ipcc *ipcc = d->host_data;

Put variables in reverse Christmas tree order.

>  
> -	irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &qcom_ipcc_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);

Should irq_set_chip_and_handler() and irq_set_chip_and_handler_name() be
updated to return an int to reduce boiler plate code?

> -	irq_set_chip_data(irq, ipcc);
> -	irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> +	ret = irq_set_chip(irq, &qcom_ipcc_irq_chip);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	irq_set_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
>  
> +	ret = irq_set_chip_data(irq, ipcc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	irq_set_noprobe(irq);
>  	return 0;

The newline before the return 0 is removed. That should also remove the
irq_set_noprobe() change from the diffstat.

Brian