public inbox for linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Guo <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Kuldeep Singh <kuldeep.singh@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable Qualcomm UFS and QMP UFS PHY drivers as built-in
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:28:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeXHm9B3u071dBZ1@QCOM-aGQu4IUr3Y> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21664acb-8fbf-4fa9-a674-982c98992df8@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 11:10:28AM +0530, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> Then it makes sense to make CONFIG_MSM_SDHCI or CONFIG_MSM_SDHCI_MSM(qcom
> specific config) as module too?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0/source/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig#L1279
> 
> Not sure why it's enabled as builtin for all vendors.

For whatever reason it's enabled there, let it be.  Do not make more
developers life harder please.

From what I can see, maintainers of other platforms are flexible if
built-in for some options really makes most developers life easier,
but Qualcomm folks seems to have a high standard on this.

Shawn

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-20  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-17  3:55 [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable Qualcomm UFS and QMP UFS PHY drivers as built-in Shawn Guo
2026-04-17  8:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-17  8:37   ` Shawn Guo
2026-04-17  8:44     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-17 10:37       ` Shawn Guo
2026-04-17 12:57         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-17 22:59         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-04-20  5:40           ` Kuldeep Singh
2026-04-20  6:28             ` Shawn Guo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeXHm9B3u071dBZ1@QCOM-aGQu4IUr3Y \
    --to=shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuldeep.singh@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lumag@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox