From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] trace/events: add chip name and hwirq to irq entry tracepoint Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 23:28:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1435162650-32266-1-git-send-email-ankgupta@codeaurora.org> <20150624124227.1cddbbac@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:52389 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753164AbbGEV3S (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jul 2015 17:29:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150624124227.1cddbbac@gandalf.local.home> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ankit Gupta , mingo@redhat.com, agross@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, rdunlap@infradead.org, standby24x7@gmail.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gavidov@codeaurora.org, sdharia@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, mlocke@codeaurora.org On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > + > > +#define show_chip_name(irq) \ > > + (irq_get_irq_data(irq) \ > > + ? irq_get_irq_data(irq)->chip->name \ > > + : "NULL") > > + > > +#define show_hwirq(irq) \ > > + (irq_get_irq_data(irq) \ > > + ? irq_get_irq_data(irq)->hwirq \ > > + : -ENODEV) > > Note these magic functions will only be useful for the tracefs reads of > the trace files. Userspace tools that extract the data (like perf and > trace-cmd), will have no idea of how to parse it. > > I'm not against doing this, but I'm just letting you know what the > effect of this change will be. What's worse is, that they are racy against a concurrent teardown of the interrupt. Not a good idea ... Thanks, tglx