From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subhash Jadavani Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] scsi: ufs: fix exception event handling Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 14:12:02 -0700 Message-ID: References: <01e6421c38e4eb1f67f3c98a8dab44a85f791ef2.1525343531.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <01e6421c38e4eb1f67f3c98a8dab44a85f791ef2.1525343531.git.asutoshd@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Asutosh Das Cc: cang@codeaurora.org, vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org, vinholikatti@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Maya Erez , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 2018-05-03 04:07, Asutosh Das wrote: > From: Maya Erez > > The device can set the exception event bit in one of the response UPIU, > for example to notify the need for urgent BKOPs operation. > In such a case the host driver calls ufshcd_exception_event_handler to > handle this notification. > When trying to check the exception event status (for finding the cause > for > the exception event), the device may be busy with additional SCSI > commands > handling and may not respond within the 100ms timeout. > > To prevent that, we need to block SCSI commands during handling of > exception events and allow retransmissions of the query requests, > in case of timeout. > > Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani > Signed-off-by: Maya Erez > Signed-off-by: Can Guo > Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index 6dabce8..838ba8f0 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -4967,6 +4967,7 @@ static void > ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work) > hba = container_of(work, struct ufs_hba, eeh_work); > > pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev); > + scsi_block_requests(hba->host); > err = ufshcd_get_ee_status(hba, &status); > if (err) { > dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to get exception status %d\n", > @@ -4980,6 +4981,7 @@ static void > ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work) > ufshcd_bkops_exception_event_handler(hba); > > out: > + scsi_unblock_requests(hba->host); > pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev); > return; > } Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project