Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 12/12] drm/msm/adreno: Switch to chip-id for identifying GPU
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:38:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9806e33-2094-dd4b-ec63-06dd8dbbd224@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGtqw0Pj42jucV7H==81WckYQZxBLSwb_ksB+=6pFmC6fQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 27/07/2023 00:37, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:45 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/07/2023 00:10, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>>>
>>> Since the revision becomes an opaque identifier with future GPUs, move
>>> away from treating different ranges of bits as having a given meaning.
>>> This means that we need to explicitly list different patch revisions in
>>> the device table.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a4xx_gpu.c      |   2 +-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c      |  11 +-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c    |   2 +-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c      |  13 ++-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c      |   9 +-
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 128 ++++++++++-----------
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c    |  16 +--
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h    |  51 ++++----
>>>    8 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a4xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a4xx_gpu.c
>>> index 715436cb3996..8b4cdf95f445 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a4xx_gpu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a4xx_gpu.c
>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void a4xx_enable_hwcg(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>        gpu_write(gpu, REG_A4XX_RBBM_CLOCK_DELAY_HLSQ, 0x00220000);
>>>        /* Early A430's have a timing issue with SP/TP power collapse;
>>>           disabling HW clock gating prevents it. */
>>> -     if (adreno_is_a430(adreno_gpu) && adreno_gpu->rev.patchid < 2)
>>> +     if (adreno_is_a430(adreno_gpu) && adreno_patchid(adreno_gpu) < 2)
>>>                gpu_write(gpu, REG_A4XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CTL, 0);
>>>        else
>>>                gpu_write(gpu, REG_A4XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CTL, 0xAAAAAAAA);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
>>> index f0803e94ebe5..70d2b5342cd9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c
>>> @@ -1744,6 +1744,7 @@ struct msm_gpu *a5xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>        struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
>>>        struct platform_device *pdev = priv->gpu_pdev;
>>>        struct adreno_platform_config *config = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>>> +     const struct adreno_info *info;
>>>        struct a5xx_gpu *a5xx_gpu = NULL;
>>>        struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu;
>>>        struct msm_gpu *gpu;
>>> @@ -1770,7 +1771,15 @@ struct msm_gpu *a5xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>
>>>        nr_rings = 4;
>>>
>>> -     if (adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(5, 1, 0, ANY_ID), config->rev))
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * Note that we wouldn't have been able to get this far if there is not
>>> +      * a device table entry for this chip_id
>>> +      */
>>> +     info = adreno_find_info(config->chip_id);
>>> +     if (WARN_ON(!info))
>>> +             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> +
>>> +     if (info->revn == 510)
>>>                nr_rings = 1;
>>>
>>>        ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, nr_rings);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
>>> index 0e63a1429189..7705f8010484 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
>>> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void a540_lm_setup(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>
>>>        /* The battery current limiter isn't enabled for A540 */
>>>        config = AGC_LM_CONFIG_BCL_DISABLED;
>>> -     config |= adreno_gpu->rev.patchid << AGC_LM_CONFIG_GPU_VERSION_SHIFT;
>>> +     config |= adreno_patchid(adreno_gpu) << AGC_LM_CONFIG_GPU_VERSION_SHIFT;
>>>
>>>        /* For now disable GPMU side throttling */
>>>        config |= AGC_LM_CONFIG_THROTTLE_DISABLE;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>> index f1bb20574018..a9ba547a120c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>> @@ -790,10 +790,15 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_start(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, unsigned int state)
>>>        gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_AHB_FENCE_RANGE_0,
>>>                (1 << 31) | (0xa << 18) | (0xa0));
>>>
>>> -     chipid = adreno_gpu->rev.core << 24;
>>> -     chipid |= adreno_gpu->rev.major << 16;
>>> -     chipid |= adreno_gpu->rev.minor << 12;
>>> -     chipid |= adreno_gpu->rev.patchid << 8;
>>> +     /* Note that the GMU has a slightly different layout for
>>> +      * chip_id, for whatever reason, so a bit of massaging
>>> +      * is needed.  The upper 16b are the same, but minor and
>>> +      * patchid are packed in four bits each with the lower
>>> +      * 8b unused:
>>> +      */
>>> +     chipid  = adreno_gpu->chip_id & 0xffff0000;
>>> +     chipid |= (adreno_gpu->chip_id << 4) & 0xf000; /* minor */
>>> +     chipid |= (adreno_gpu->chip_id << 8) & 0x0f00; /* patchid */
>>
>> I'd beg for explicit FIELD_GET and FIELD_PREP here.
>>
>>>
>>>        gmu_write(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_HFI_SFR_ADDR, chipid);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>> index 77b23c004b94..ed075729ca09 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>> @@ -2344,10 +2344,13 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>        /*
>>>         * We need to know the platform type before calling into adreno_gpu_init
>>>         * so that the hw_apriv flag can be correctly set. Snoop into the info
>>> -      * and grab the revision number
>>> +      * and grab the revision number.
>>> +      *
>>> +      * Note that we wouldn't have been able to get this far if there is not
>>> +      * a device table entry for this chip_id
>>
>> Having seen this note twice, shouldn't we explicitly pass adreno_info to
>> our aNxx_gpu_init() functions and then further to adreno_gpu_init()?
>>
>>>         */
>>> -     info = adreno_info(config->rev);
>>> -     if (!info)
>>> +     info = adreno_find_info(config->chip_id);
>>> +     if (WARN_ON(!info))
>>>                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>
>>>        adreno_gpu->base.hw_apriv = !!(info->quirks & ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> index fd2e183bce60..4a718ff33635 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ module_param_named(allow_vram_carveout, allow_vram_carveout, bool, 0600);
>>>
>>>    static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
>>>        {
>>> -             .rev   = ADRENO_REV(2, 0, 0, 0),
>>> +             .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x02000000),
>>
>> This begs to use bit masks, but see below
>>
>>>                .family = ADRENO_2XX_GEN1,
>>>                .revn  = 200,
>>>                .fw = {
>>
>> [skipped]
>>
>>> @@ -77,7 +77,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
>>>                .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
>>>                .init  = a3xx_gpu_init,
>>>        }, {
>>> -             .rev   = ADRENO_REV(3, 2, ANY_ID, ANY_ID),
>>> +             .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(
>>> +                     0x03020000,
>>> +                     0x03020001,
>>> +                     0x03020002
>>
>> definitely a bitmask would help
>>
>>> +             ),
>>>                .family = ADRENO_3XX,
>>>                .revn  = 320,
>>>                .fw = {
>>
>> [skipped the rest]
>>
>>> @@ -494,31 +502,16 @@ MODULE_FIRMWARE("qcom/a630_sqe.fw");
>>>    MODULE_FIRMWARE("qcom/a630_gmu.bin");
>>>    MODULE_FIRMWARE("qcom/a630_zap.mbn");
>>>
>>> -static inline bool _rev_match(uint8_t entry, uint8_t id)
>>> -{
>>> -     return (entry == ANY_ID) || (entry == id);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -bool adreno_cmp_rev(struct adreno_rev rev1, struct adreno_rev rev2)
>>> -{
>>> -
>>> -     return _rev_match(rev1.core, rev2.core) &&
>>> -             _rev_match(rev1.major, rev2.major) &&
>>> -             _rev_match(rev1.minor, rev2.minor) &&
>>> -             _rev_match(rev1.patchid, rev2.patchid);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -const struct adreno_info *adreno_info(struct adreno_rev rev)
>>> +const struct adreno_info *adreno_find_info(uint32_t chip_id)
>>>    {
>>> -     int i;
>>> -
>>>        /* identify gpu: */
>>> -     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gpulist); i++) {
>>> +     for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gpulist); i++) {
>>>                const struct adreno_info *info = &gpulist[i];
>>>                if (info->machine && !of_machine_is_compatible(info->machine))
>>>                        continue;
>>> -             if (adreno_cmp_rev(info->rev, rev))
>>> -                     return info;
>>> +             for (int j = 0; info->chip_ids[j]; j++)
>>> +                     if (info->chip_ids[j] == chip_id)
>>> +                             return info;
>>>        }
>>>
>>>        return NULL;
>>> @@ -598,12 +591,11 @@ struct msm_gpu *adreno_load_gpu(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>        return NULL;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> -static int find_chipid(struct device *dev, struct adreno_rev *rev)
>>> +static int find_chipid(struct device *dev, uint32_t *chipid)
>>>    {
>>>        struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
>>>        const char *compat;
>>>        int ret;
>>> -     u32 chipid;
>>>
>>>        /* first search the compat strings for qcom,adreno-XYZ.W: */
>>>        ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "compatible", 0, &compat);
>>> @@ -612,32 +604,34 @@ static int find_chipid(struct device *dev, struct adreno_rev *rev)
>>>
>>>                if (sscanf(compat, "qcom,adreno-%u.%u", &r, &patch) == 2 ||
>>>                    sscanf(compat, "amd,imageon-%u.%u", &r, &patch) == 2) {
>>> -                     rev->core = r / 100;
>>> +                     uint32_t core, major, minor;
>>> +
>>> +                     core = r / 100;
>>>                        r %= 100;
>>> -                     rev->major = r / 10;
>>> +                     major = r / 10;
>>>                        r %= 10;
>>> -                     rev->minor = r;
>>> -                     rev->patchid = patch;
>>> +                     minor = r;
>>> +
>>> +                     *chipid = (core << 24) |
>>> +                             (major << 16) |
>>> +                             (minor << 8) |
>>> +                             patch;
>>
>> This starts to look realy crazy. I'd repeat my suggestion of moving
>> towards of_device match data. This would result in some duplication,
>> we'd have to explicitly list all supported compatibles in the
>> of_match_table. But then we can drop all the CHIPID lists from device
>> table and/or manual parsing of the chipid from the compat field.
>>
>> This way we can have per-SoC overrides, etc.
>>
>>>
>>>                        return 0;
>>>                }
>>> +
>>> +             if (sscanf(compat, "qcom,adreno-%08x", chipid) == 1)
>>> +                     return 0;
>>>        }
>>>
>>>        /* and if that fails, fall back to legacy "qcom,chipid" property: */
>>> -     ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,chipid", &chipid);
>>> +     ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,chipid", chipid);
>>>        if (ret) {
>>>                DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "could not parse qcom,chipid: %d\n", ret);
>>>                return ret;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> -     rev->core = (chipid >> 24) & 0xff;
>>> -     rev->major = (chipid >> 16) & 0xff;
>>> -     rev->minor = (chipid >> 8) & 0xff;
>>> -     rev->patchid = (chipid & 0xff);
>>> -
>>>        dev_warn(dev, "Using legacy qcom,chipid binding!\n");
>>> -     dev_warn(dev, "Use compatible qcom,adreno-%u%u%u.%u instead.\n",
>>> -             rev->core, rev->major, rev->minor, rev->patchid);
>>>
>>>        return 0;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -651,22 +645,22 @@ static int adreno_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
>>>        struct msm_gpu *gpu;
>>>        int ret;
>>>
>>> -     ret = find_chipid(dev, &config.rev);
>>> +     ret = find_chipid(dev, &config.chip_id);
>>>        if (ret)
>>>                return ret;
>>>
>>>        dev->platform_data = &config;
>>>        priv->gpu_pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>>>
>>> -     info = adreno_info(config.rev);
>>> +     info = adreno_find_info(config.chip_id);
>>>
>>>        if (!info) {
>>>                dev_warn(drm->dev, "Unknown GPU revision: %"ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT"\n",
>>> -                     ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(config.rev));
>>> +                     ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(config.chip_id));
>>>                return -ENXIO;
>>>        }
>>>
>>> -     DBG("Found GPU: %"ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT, ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(config.rev));
>>> +     DBG("Found GPU: %"ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT, ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(config.chip_id));
>>>
>>>        priv->is_a2xx = info->family < ADRENO_3XX;
>>>        priv->has_cached_coherent =
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>> index 1a982a926f21..1274609a74b1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>> @@ -326,10 +326,7 @@ int adreno_get_param(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_file_private *ctx,
>>>                *value = !adreno_is_a650_family(adreno_gpu) ? 0x100000 : 0;
>>>                return 0;
>>>        case MSM_PARAM_CHIP_ID:
>>> -             *value =  (uint64_t)adreno_gpu->rev.patchid |
>>> -                      ((uint64_t)adreno_gpu->rev.minor << 8) |
>>> -                      ((uint64_t)adreno_gpu->rev.major << 16) |
>>> -                      ((uint64_t)adreno_gpu->rev.core  << 24);
>>> +             *value = adreno_gpu->chip_id;
>>>                if (!adreno_gpu->info->revn)
>>>                        *value |= ((uint64_t) adreno_gpu->speedbin) << 32;
>>>                return 0;
>>> @@ -849,7 +846,7 @@ void adreno_show(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_gpu_state *state,
>>>
>>>        drm_printf(p, "revision: %u (%"ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT")\n",
>>>                        adreno_gpu->info->revn,
>>> -                     ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(adreno_gpu->rev));
>>> +                     ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(adreno_gpu->chip_id));
>>>        /*
>>>         * If this is state collected due to iova fault, so fault related info
>>>         *
>>> @@ -922,7 +919,7 @@ void adreno_dump_info(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>
>>>        printk("revision: %u (%"ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT")\n",
>>>                        adreno_gpu->info->revn,
>>> -                     ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(adreno_gpu->rev));
>>> +                     ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(adreno_gpu->chip_id));
>>>
>>>        for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++) {
>>>                struct msm_ringbuffer *ring = gpu->rb[i];
>>> @@ -1072,14 +1069,13 @@ int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>        struct adreno_platform_config *config = dev->platform_data;
>>>        struct msm_gpu_config adreno_gpu_config  = { 0 };
>>>        struct msm_gpu *gpu = &adreno_gpu->base;
>>> -     struct adreno_rev *rev = &config->rev;
>>>        const char *gpu_name;
>>>        u32 speedbin;
>>>        int ret;
>>>
>>>        adreno_gpu->funcs = funcs;
>>> -     adreno_gpu->info = adreno_info(config->rev);
>>> -     adreno_gpu->rev = *rev;
>>> +     adreno_gpu->info = adreno_find_info(config->chip_id);
>>> +     adreno_gpu->chip_id = config->chip_id;
>>>
>>>        /* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use (or is absent). */
>>>        if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) ||
>>> @@ -1104,7 +1100,7 @@ int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>        adreno_gpu->speedbin = (uint16_t) (0xffff & speedbin);
>>>
>>>        gpu_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%"ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT,
>>> -                     ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(config->rev));
>>> +                     ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(config->chip_id));
>>>        if (!gpu_name)
>>>                return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>> index 73e7155f164c..18f53c7ab589 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>> @@ -54,23 +54,15 @@ enum adreno_family {
>>>    #define ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV           BIT(3)
>>>    #define ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_CACHED_COHERENT    BIT(4)
>>>
>>> -struct adreno_rev {
>>> -     uint8_t  core;
>>> -     uint8_t  major;
>>> -     uint8_t  minor;
>>> -     uint8_t  patchid;
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -#define ANY_ID 0xff
>>> -
>>> -#define ADRENO_REV(core, major, minor, patchid) \
>>> -     ((struct adreno_rev){ core, major, minor, patchid })
>>> -
>>>    /* Helper for formating the chip_id in the way that userspace tools like
>>>     * crashdec expect.
>>>     */
>>>    #define ADRENO_CHIPID_FMT "u.%u.%u.%u"
>>> -#define ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(_r) (_r).core, (_r).major, (_r).minor, (_r).patchid
>>> +#define ADRENO_CHIPID_ARGS(_c) \
>>> +     (((_c) >> 24) & 0xff), \
>>> +     (((_c) >> 16) & 0xff), \
>>> +     (((_c) >> 8)  & 0xff), \
>>> +     ((_c) & 0xff)
>>
>> So, we still have some meaning for chipid?
> 
> Only enough to do the inverse of what userspace does when parsing
> devcoredump to construct chip-id.  Basically it is just a different
> way to represent a 32b #

What about passing it in the direct form? The macro adds assumptions.

> 
> BR,
> -R
> 
>>>
>>>    struct adreno_gpu_funcs {
>>>        struct msm_gpu_funcs base;
>>> @@ -87,7 +79,12 @@ extern const struct adreno_reglist a660_hwcg[], a690_hwcg[];
>>>
>>>    struct adreno_info {
>>>        const char *machine;
>>> -     struct adreno_rev rev;
>>> +     /**
>>> +      * @chipids: Table of matching chip-ids
>>> +      *
>>> +      * Terminated with 0 sentinal
>>> +      */
>>> +     uint32_t *chip_ids;
>>>        enum adreno_family family;
>>>        uint32_t revn;
>>>        const char *fw[ADRENO_FW_MAX];
>>> @@ -107,6 +104,8 @@ struct adreno_info {
>>>        uint32_t *speedbins;
>>>    };
>>>
>>> +#define ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(tbl...) (uint32_t[]) { tbl, 0 }
>>> +
>>>    /*
>>>     * Helper to build a speedbin table, ie. the table:
>>>     *      fuse | speedbin
>>> @@ -125,12 +124,12 @@ struct adreno_info {
>>>     */
>>>    #define ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(tbl...) (uint32_t[]) { tbl, UINT_MAX }
>>>
>>> -const struct adreno_info *adreno_info(struct adreno_rev rev);
>>> +const struct adreno_info *adreno_find_info(uint32_t chip_id);
>>>
>>>    struct adreno_gpu {
>>>        struct msm_gpu base;
>>> -     struct adreno_rev rev;
>>>        const struct adreno_info *info;
>>> +     uint32_t chip_id;
>>>        uint16_t speedbin;
>>>        const struct adreno_gpu_funcs *funcs;
>>>
>>> @@ -179,7 +178,7 @@ struct adreno_ocmem {
>>>
>>>    /* platform config data (ie. from DT, or pdata) */
>>>    struct adreno_platform_config {
>>> -     struct adreno_rev rev;
>>> +     uint32_t chip_id;
>>>    };
>>>
>>>    #define ADRENO_IDLE_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(1000)
>>> @@ -196,7 +195,15 @@ struct adreno_platform_config {
>>>        __ret;                                             \
>>>    })
>>>
>>> -bool adreno_cmp_rev(struct adreno_rev rev1, struct adreno_rev rev2);
>>> +static inline uint8_t adreno_patchid(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>> +{
>>> +     /* It is probably ok to assume legacy "adreno_rev" format
>>> +      * for all a6xx devices, but probably best to limit this
>>> +      * to older things.
>>> +      */
>>> +     WARN_ON_ONCE(gpu->info->family >= ADRENO_6XX_GEN1);
>>> +     return gpu->chip_id & 0xff;
>>> +}
>>>
>>>    static inline bool adreno_is_revn(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu, uint32_t revn)
>>>    {
>>> @@ -252,7 +259,7 @@ static inline bool adreno_is_a330(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>
>>>    static inline bool adreno_is_a330v2(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>    {
>>> -     return adreno_is_a330(gpu) && (gpu->rev.patchid > 0);
>>> +     return adreno_is_a330(gpu) && (adreno_patchid(gpu) > 0);
>>>    }
>>>
>>>    static inline int adreno_is_a405(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>> @@ -342,8 +349,7 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a650(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>
>>>    static inline int adreno_is_7c3(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>    {
>>> -     /* The order of args is important here to handle ANY_ID correctly */
>>> -     return adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 3, 5, ANY_ID), gpu->rev);
>>> +     return gpu->info->chip_ids[0] == 0x06030500;
>>
>> Ugh. The thing that bugs me isn't even the manual comparison of
>> chip_ids[0], but the fact that these two platforms stand aside. I think
>> at the end we should have a single mechanism for checking GPU's SKUs.
>>
>> Or maybe we should get rid of that completely.
>>
>> If we get rid of a single gpulist table and move individual GPU info
>> definitions to aNxx_gpu.c, we can subclass a generic info structure with
>> generation-specific data, for example generation-specific quirks,
>> pointers to hcwg or VBIF registers, etc. And then instead of having
>> adreno_is_foo all over the code we can migrate most of these checks to
>> data in the gpu info data.
>>
>>>    }
>>>
>>>    static inline int adreno_is_a660(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>> @@ -358,8 +364,7 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a680(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>
>>>    static inline int adreno_is_a690(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>    {
>>> -     /* The order of args is important here to handle ANY_ID correctly */
>>> -     return adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 9, 0, ANY_ID), gpu->rev);
>>> +     return gpu->info->chip_ids[0] == 0x06090000;
>>>    };
>>>    /* check for a615, a616, a618, a619 or any a630 derivatives */
>>>    static inline int adreno_is_a630_family(const struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>
>> --
>> With best wishes
>> Dmitry
>>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-26 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-06 21:10 [PATCH 00/12] drm/msm/adreno: Move away from legacy revision matching Rob Clark
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/msm/adreno: Remove GPU name Rob Clark
2023-07-06 23:21   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-07  0:04   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/msm/adreno: Remove redundant gmem size param Rob Clark
2023-07-06 23:22   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-13 19:46     ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-07-07  2:23   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/msm/adreno: Remove redundant revn param Rob Clark
2023-07-06 23:26   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-07  2:24   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/msm/adreno: Use quirk identify hw_apriv Rob Clark
2023-07-06 23:27   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-07  2:25   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/msm/adreno: Use quirk to identify cached-coherent support Rob Clark
2023-07-06 23:29   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-07  2:29   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-07 15:53     ` Rob Clark
2023-07-13 20:05   ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-07-13 22:25     ` Rob Clark
2023-07-17 22:00       ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/msm/adreno: Allow SoC specific gpu device table entries Rob Clark
2023-07-07  0:40   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-13 22:15     ` [Freedreno] " Akhil P Oommen
2023-07-07  2:34   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-13 20:26     ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-07-26 18:28       ` Rob Clark
2023-07-26 20:00         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-26 20:11           ` Rob Clark
2023-07-26 21:43             ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-26 22:03               ` Rob Clark
2023-07-26 22:33                 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-26 22:53                   ` Rob Clark
2023-07-27  7:51                     ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-27 14:52                       ` Rob Clark
2023-07-27 21:13                   ` Rob Clark
2023-07-27 22:02                     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-28 14:43                       ` Rob Clark
2023-07-28 14:51                         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/msm/adreno: Move speedbin mapping to device table Rob Clark
2023-07-07  2:54   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-10 19:56     ` Rob Clark
2023-07-10 20:54       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/msm/adreno: Bring the a630 family together Rob Clark
2023-07-06 23:32   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/msm/adreno: Add adreno family Rob Clark
2023-07-06 23:35   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-07  3:16     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-07 23:52       ` Rob Clark
2023-07-07 23:54         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-07  2:49   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/msm/adreno: Add helper for formating chip-id Rob Clark
2023-07-06 23:36   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-10 20:21     ` Rob Clark
2023-07-07  2:50   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 11/12] dt-bindings: drm/msm/gpu: Extend bindings for chip-id Rob Clark
2023-07-07  7:26   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-07-07 13:09     ` Rob Clark
2023-07-06 21:10 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/msm/adreno: Switch to chip-id for identifying GPU Rob Clark
2023-07-07  0:25   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-07 16:08     ` Rob Clark
2023-07-15 13:38       ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-07-15 14:12         ` Rob Clark
2023-07-26 21:45         ` Rob Clark
2023-07-07  3:45   ` [Freedreno] " Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-13 21:39     ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-07-13 22:06       ` Rob Clark
2023-07-13 22:53         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-07-17 22:09         ` Akhil P Oommen
2023-07-26 21:37     ` Rob Clark
2023-07-26 21:38       ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2023-07-26 21:44         ` Rob Clark
2023-07-26 21:45           ` Dmitry Baryshkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b9806e33-2094-dd4b-ec63-06dd8dbbd224@linaro.org \
    --to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox