Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikita Travkin <nikita@trvn.ru>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8916: Add BMS and charger
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:44:34 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd1da1d81f1345e25c37995af3014308@trvn.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e56bec85-46be-4c88-ae88-199e7272ccdd@linaro.org>

Konrad Dybcio писал(а) 27.10.2023 01:03:
> On 10/26/23 21:17, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 08:54:00PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 10/24/23 11:29, Nikita Travkin wrote:
>>>> Konrad Dybcio писал(а) 24.10.2023 13:34:
>>>>> On 10/23/23 08:20, Nikita Travkin wrote:
>>>>>> pm8916 contains some hardware blocks for battery powered devices:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - VM-BMS: Battery voltage monitoring block.
>>>>>> - LBC: Linear battery charger.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add them to the pmic dtsi so the devices that make use of those blocks
>>>>>> can enable them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@trvn.ru>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8916.dtsi | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8916.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8916.dtsi
>>>>>> index f4de86787743..4b2e8fb47d2d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8916.dtsi
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8916.dtsi
>>>>>> @@ -41,6 +41,35 @@ watchdog {
>>>>>>     			};
>>>>>>     		};
>>>>>>     +		pm8916_charger: charger@1000 {
>>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,pm8916-lbc";
>>>>>> +			reg = <0x1000>, <0x1200>, <0x1300>, <0x1600>;
>>>>>> +			reg-names = "chgr", "bat_if", "usb", "misc";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +			interrupts = <0x0 0x10 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x10 5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x10 6 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x10 7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x12 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x12 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x13 0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x13 1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x13 2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
>>>>>> +				     <0x0 0x13 4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
>>>>>> +			interrupt-names = "vbat_det",
>>>>>> +					  "fast_chg",
>>>>>> +					  "chg_fail",
>>>>>> +					  "chg_done",
>>>>>> +					  "bat_pres",
>>>>>> +					  "temp_ok",
>>>>>> +					  "coarse_det",
>>>>>> +					  "usb_vbus",
>>>>> So, both the charger and the USBIN driver use the same irq? :/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AFAIU the usbin extcon driver pretty much just tracks the state
>>>> of the IRQ to report extcon. It happens to assume the same part
>>>> of the pmic though, yes, which also means there will be no user
>>>> that would enable both charger and vbus extcon, since charger
>>>> driver provides this functionality as well.
>>> So, should USBIN be removed from PM8916 dt since it's essentially
>>> a part of the charger block?
>>>
>>
>> The "USB_IN" pad of the PM8916 seems to be connected on pretty much all
>> devices, even if they are using external chargers and the charging
>> functionality of PM8916 is completely disabled. For those devices, the
>> &pm8916_usbin device provides a convenient way to detect the USB state,
>> even without a working charger driver.
>>
>> While we could modify the PM8916 charger driver and DT node to have some
>> special mode where charging and battery monitoring is completely
>> disabled and only the USBIN extcon is provided, I'm not sure if that
>> would provide a significant advantage compared to just keeping the
>> simple &pm8916_usbin node with the existing driver.
> Hmm okay I see..
> 
> Generally it's rather "no bueno" to have two DT nodes consuming the
> same register space.. What happens when you enable BMS on a device
> with a non-PM8916 charger? Does it correctly recognize "no battery"
> etc.?
> 

The _charger and _bms are separate and communicate in a generic
manner via power-supplies and supply core (see 3/3) so giving
a different charger to _bms can work.

If an external charger is present in the device, qcom mandates
"external charger" optional line of the pmic to be tied, and
_charger is then disabled. The driver bails out in this case,
but _usbin could still be used.

> Konrad

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-27  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-23  6:20 [PATCH v2 0/3] pm8916: Add BMS and charger Nikita Travkin
2023-10-23  6:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: Add pm8916 vm-bms and lbc Nikita Travkin
2023-10-23 17:40   ` Rob Herring
2023-10-24  5:08     ` Nikita Travkin
2023-10-25 12:21       ` Lee Jones
2023-10-25 12:57         ` Nikita Travkin
2023-10-27  7:14           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-25 15:44   ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2023-10-27  7:20     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-31  7:54       ` Lee Jones
2023-11-14  5:24         ` Nikita Travkin
2023-11-14 15:22           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-10-23  6:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8916: Add BMS and charger Nikita Travkin
2023-10-24  8:34   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-10-24  9:29     ` Nikita Travkin
2023-10-26 18:54       ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-10-26 19:17         ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-26 20:03           ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-10-27  5:44             ` Nikita Travkin [this message]
2023-10-31 11:20               ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-10-23  6:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916-longcheer-l8150: Add battery " Nikita Travkin
2023-10-24  8:33   ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-10-24  9:33     ` Nikita Travkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bd1da1d81f1345e25c37995af3014308@trvn.ru \
    --to=nikita@trvn.ru \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
    --cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox