From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com>,
andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mukesh.savaliya@oss.qualcomm.com, anup.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk: Add firmware-name to QUPv3 nodes
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:00:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be816a6d-c4e6-4cf1-b5dd-fd59515a42ef@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f016d47f-919c-2944-ab8f-68e450e5836a@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 9/26/25 8:43 AM, Viken Dadhaniya wrote:
>
>
> On 9/25/2025 2:22 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 9/25/25 6:26 AM, Viken Dadhaniya wrote:
>>> Traditionally, firmware loading for Serial Engines (SE) in the QUP hardware
>>> of Qualcomm SoCs has been managed by TrustZone (TZ). While this approach
>>> ensures secure SE assignment and access control, it limits flexibility for
>>> developers who need to enable various protocols on different SEs.
>>>
>>> Add the firmware-name property to QUPv3 nodes in the device tree to enable
>>> firmware loading from the Linux environment. Handle SE assignments and
>>> access control permissions directly within Linux, removing the dependency
>>> on TrustZone.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Viken, you've posted a lot of patches like these lately for
>> specific boards.
>>
>> Should we instead push this to the SoC DTSI, to limit the boilerplate?
>
> The firmware load from Linux feature is applicable only to devkit boards
> (RB3 Gen2 and EVK), and therefore, it is being added exclusively to the
> board-specific device tree files.
Do we expect GENI_SE_INVALID_PROTO to ever show up on hardware that
can't make use of fw loading though?
>> If I recall correctly, you said these ELFs are not vendor-signed, so
>> it should be OK to have them be assigned globally
>>
>
> This feature is intended solely for use with the development kit and is not
> intended for commercialization. Therefore, vendor sign-off is currently not
> applicable.
Well you conveniently never really mentioned this in the driver patchset..
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 4:26 [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk: Add firmware-name to QUPv3 nodes Viken Dadhaniya
2025-09-25 8:52 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-09-26 6:43 ` Viken Dadhaniya
2025-10-22 17:00 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2025-10-24 11:37 ` Viken Dadhaniya
2025-11-04 16:53 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-10-27 22:37 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be816a6d-c4e6-4cf1-b5dd-fd59515a42ef@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=anup.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mukesh.savaliya@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox