From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752A7C433E1 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1B820738 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="CsKMLBUP" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726946AbgGGE2B (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 00:28:01 -0400 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]:64415 "EHLO m43-7.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725825AbgGGE2B (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 00:28:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1594096080; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=60Navhldv42+vmTmut42AtChOCPYqVL1BHt+i2yrzso=; b=CsKMLBUPRa1juZ98eufq2c4fo8Ul4Oi5v4mUF2Gre7YJBKCsqJkNi9gDQRQSnAAs6ZkFt4g+ K7EWTsQXffvrPn72NeO0rpN+8BhkQVTNLCyIK9WcufKugUBFu2NVsXBDIMdRVveOujotX+iS qXzffjMAtnh3tA8dkg2h15uX5fM= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI1MzIzYiIsICJsaW51eC1hcm0tbXNtQHZnZXIua2VybmVsLm9yZyIsICJiZTllNGEiXQ== Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n14.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f03f9b7c9789fa906e6151c (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 04:27:35 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 96CE1C433CB; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [61.3.20.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rnayak) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E024C433C8; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 04:27:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 6E024C433C8 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rnayak@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: spi-qcom-qspi: Use OPP API to set clk/perf state To: Mark Brown Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mka@chromium.org, Alok Chauhan , Akash Asthana References: <1593769293-6354-1-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <1593769293-6354-2-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org> <20200703170157.GA54804@sirena.org.uk> From: Rajendra Nayak Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:57:29 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200703170157.GA54804@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 7/3/2020 10:31 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 03:11:31PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> QSPI needs to vote on a performance state of a power domain depending on >> the clock rate. Add support for it by specifying the perf state/clock rate >> as an OPP table in device tree. > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. Hey Mark, as mentioned in the cover letter I wanted this to land via the qcom tree, since Bjorn already has a patch in his tree which would otherwise conflict with this change, if you were to pull this. Hence I had this rebased on qcom for-next and requested Bjorn to pull it in, with your ACK. Hope thats fine with you. thanks, Rajendra -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation