From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8AA5215F4B; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739787830; cv=none; b=FOEcY60JEATUY3hYELCJEFX/QRUOH2V5tnjY1RMF4Nsdhnj4tK+vffyaBEe3LPC7of7aNFfCRrb4RWIu0oweQdt+IozRXC4F0wEG7MjnzqIfzy/85j/yM2bEtTRQ9LKfG9qqLnUUxayiT39ZqSfqCoWI1FnXQipewfszxOMu+rs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739787830; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WovgSGbvNWLLRcAWn+Mya6CHxmCESkWIMuKX5gtD5aI=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=iq7UNIX8uvNQwOVsMZeg1Q75RmXHSktasPQ6TI82TVSMnHN3+cKvsOffFRbAwxHV8MogPkhigKKVJnEtk1IznaenaBC4Tz/LwcaH3zQeP51ZS7xHNWaAq1sLh2sw8GrQ3yfc+sp9aF6W6RoILrKnRp1Zfps6XQDq/6fygOeFfmk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=BFnG4wDc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="BFnG4wDc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=WovgSGbvNWLLRcAWn+Mya6CHxmCESkWIMuKX5gtD5aI=; t=1739787829; x=1740997429; b=BFnG4wDccXfm9v/YgG2uOh+/7hulCLBJphafC4pVRr4USz0 1Dg0Hmpazntti/JFpt1WVvz9jIw+C07U7Us6lpZFIlLbJu4lrxC1kvogUCJpEMhbWyl8VH6E8SACw WAp/Jj7xju02PUPSzpSd/H30k9pxHqBKYYrQfCKDHRM3eVJIt3MJj/3SwG3KVVmxZLXQe573UZR4X dNroxTxY+47E9reHGW6qY4Dy50NC/DJja9/21i8HUAH130zQ1TSIKIvOeoghbRi5HyrKR4JDGy3m2 BZHUGhzr3sRYhHE4dvgd7FlkL855IhhNwwKxzknQ7+hRTLyu4oqK7OoTqLrtGUYA==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tjyHp-00000000GpA-1DBY; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:23:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] pstore: directly mapped regions From: Johannes Berg To: Eugen Hristev , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, kees@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, gpiccoli@igalia.com, pmladek@suse.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de, senozhatsky@chromium.org, quic_mojha@quicinc.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@quicinc.com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:23:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20250217101706.2104498-1-eugen.hristev@linaro.org> References: <20250217101706.2104498-1-eugen.hristev@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 12:16 +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote: > This series comes as an RFC proposed solution to enhance pstore and > devcoredump with the following functionality: ... > This patch series attempts to solve this by reusing existing > infrastructure in pstore and devcoredump, and provide a copy-free ... You mention devcoredump multiple times, but it almost seems like you don't even know what devcoredump does? I don't see how there's any relation at all, and the code added to it seems to have no relation to the actual functionality of devcoredump either? johannes