Re: [PATCH v2 20/21] dt-bindings: display/msm/gmu: Add Adreno X2-85 GMU

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 11/11/2025 15:25, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 11/11/2025 1:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:07:26PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>> Document Adreno X2-85 GMU found in Glymur chipsets in the
>>> dt-binding specification. It is very similar to Adreno 840
>>> GMU with the additional requirement of RSCC HUB clock.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
>> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
>> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
>> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
>> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
>> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
>>
>> Please read:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>> </form letter>
>>
> 
> I think you got confused. These are new patches I have included for
> Glymur support in Rev 2 (as mentioned in the cover letter). Did you
> confuse with the other patch for Kaanapali?

I did check in the changelog and there is nothing about new bindings
patch, so you expect me to keep guessing what is happening here.

Squash this with previous patch then. It's really churn to deal with one
single liner per patch and commit msg has absoutely ZERO content to be
useful on its own.



Best regards,
Krzysztof