From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hemantk@codeaurora.org
Subject: XHCI: Question regarding process_ctrl_td()
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:26:11 -0000
Message-ID: <c76e936df2dd4a2e10df68614d446e5a.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:45544 "EHLO
	smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754343Ab3I3X0L (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:26:11 -0400
Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com

Hi

I have question regarding code snippet in process_ctrl_td()

		if (event_trb == td->last_trb) {
			if (td->urb->actual_length != 0) {
				/* Don't overwrite a previously set error code
				 */
				if ((*status == -EINPROGRESS || *status == 0) &&
						(td->urb->transfer_flags
						 & URB_SHORT_NOT_OK))
					/* Did we already see a short data
					 * stage? */
					*status = -EREMOTEIO;
			} else {
			>>>>	td->urb->actual_length =
					td->urb->transfer_buffer_length;
			}
}


For status stage of a control transfer what is the reason for overwriting
the actual_length with transfer_buffer_length in case if actual_length is
zero(highlighted with >>>>)?


Thanks,
Hemant