linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To: mani@kernel.org, hemantk@codeaurora.org, bbhatt@codeaurora.org,
	loic.poulain@linaro.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG] bus: mhi: possible deadlock in mhi_pm_disable_transition() and mhi_async_power_up()
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 10:56:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3a94b53-0d77-dafe-ce45-f9ab23278616@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

My static analysis tool reports a possible deadlock in the mhi driver in 
Linux 5.10:

mhi_async_power_up()
   mutex_lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex); --> Line 933 (Lock A)
   wait_event_timeout(mhi_cntrl->state_event, ...) --> Line 985 (Wait X)
   mutex_unlock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex); --> Line 1040 (Unlock A)

mhi_pm_disable_transition()
   mutex_lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex); --> Line 463 (Lock A)
   wake_up_all(&mhi_cntrl->state_event); --> Line 474 (Wake X)
   mutex_unlock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex); --> Line 524 (Unlock A)
   wake_up_all(&mhi_cntrl->state_event); --> Line 526 (Wake X)

When mhi_async_power_up() is executed, "Wait X" is performed by holding 
"Lock A". If mhi_pm_disable_transition() is concurrently executed at 
this time, "Wake X" cannot be performed to wake up "Wait X" in 
mhi_async_power_up(), because "Lock A" is already hold by 
mhi_async_power_up(), causing a possible deadlock.
I find that "Wait X" is performed with a timeout, to relieve the 
possible deadlock; but I think this timeout can cause inefficient execution.

I am not quite sure whether this possible problem is real and how to fix 
it if it is real.
Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks :)


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai




             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-29  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-29  2:56 Jia-Ju Bai [this message]
2022-02-01 17:15 ` [BUG] bus: mhi: possible deadlock in mhi_pm_disable_transition() and mhi_async_power_up() Daniel Thompson
2022-02-06 15:34   ` Jia-Ju Bai
2022-02-07  8:34     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-02-07  6:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-02-07  6:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3a94b53-0d77-dafe-ce45-f9ab23278616@gmail.com \
    --to=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).