From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To: mani@kernel.org, hemantk@codeaurora.org, bbhatt@codeaurora.org,
loic.poulain@linaro.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG] bus: mhi: possible deadlock in mhi_pm_disable_transition() and mhi_async_power_up()
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 10:56:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3a94b53-0d77-dafe-ce45-f9ab23278616@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
My static analysis tool reports a possible deadlock in the mhi driver in
Linux 5.10:
mhi_async_power_up()
mutex_lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex); --> Line 933 (Lock A)
wait_event_timeout(mhi_cntrl->state_event, ...) --> Line 985 (Wait X)
mutex_unlock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex); --> Line 1040 (Unlock A)
mhi_pm_disable_transition()
mutex_lock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex); --> Line 463 (Lock A)
wake_up_all(&mhi_cntrl->state_event); --> Line 474 (Wake X)
mutex_unlock(&mhi_cntrl->pm_mutex); --> Line 524 (Unlock A)
wake_up_all(&mhi_cntrl->state_event); --> Line 526 (Wake X)
When mhi_async_power_up() is executed, "Wait X" is performed by holding
"Lock A". If mhi_pm_disable_transition() is concurrently executed at
this time, "Wake X" cannot be performed to wake up "Wait X" in
mhi_async_power_up(), because "Lock A" is already hold by
mhi_async_power_up(), causing a possible deadlock.
I find that "Wait X" is performed with a timeout, to relieve the
possible deadlock; but I think this timeout can cause inefficient execution.
I am not quite sure whether this possible problem is real and how to fix
it if it is real.
Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks :)
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-29 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-29 2:56 Jia-Ju Bai [this message]
2022-02-01 17:15 ` [BUG] bus: mhi: possible deadlock in mhi_pm_disable_transition() and mhi_async_power_up() Daniel Thompson
2022-02-06 15:34 ` Jia-Ju Bai
2022-02-07 8:34 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-02-07 6:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-02-07 6:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3a94b53-0d77-dafe-ce45-f9ab23278616@gmail.com \
--to=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).