From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add compatible fallback for ipq806x for no SMEM
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:05:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3f2810f-7361-4a23-adb3-32a73ad50519@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104140635.25965-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
On 04/11/2025 15:06, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On some IPQ806x SoC SMEM might be not initialized by SBL. This is the
> case for some Google devices (the OnHub family) that can't make use of
> SMEM to detect the SoC ID.
>
> To handle these specific case, check if the SMEM is not initialized (by
> checking if the qcom_smem_get_soc_id returns -ENODEV) and fallback to
> OF machine compatible checking to identify the SoC variant.
>
> Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> index 3a8ed723a23e..17c79955ff2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-nvmem.c
> @@ -252,13 +252,22 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_krait_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_cpufreq_ipq806x_match_list[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8062", .data = (const void *)QCOM_ID_IPQ8062 },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8064", .data = (const void *)QCOM_ID_IPQ8064 },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8065", .data = (const void *)QCOM_ID_IPQ8065 },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8066", .data = (const void *)QCOM_ID_IPQ8066 },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8068", .data = (const void *)QCOM_ID_IPQ8068 },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,ipq8069", .data = (const void *)QCOM_ID_IPQ8069 },
> +};
> +
> static int qcom_cpufreq_ipq8064_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
> struct nvmem_cell *speedbin_nvmem,
> char **pvs_name,
> struct qcom_cpufreq_drv *drv)
> {
> + int msm_id = -1, ret = 0;
> int speed = 0, pvs = 0;
> - int msm_id, ret = 0;
> u8 *speedbin;
> size_t len;
>
> @@ -275,8 +284,30 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_ipq8064_name_version(struct device *cpu_dev,
> get_krait_bin_format_a(cpu_dev, &speed, &pvs, speedbin);
>
> ret = qcom_smem_get_soc_id(&msm_id);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> + struct device_node *root;
> +
> + root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> + if (!root) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> +
> + /* Fallback to compatible match with no SMEM initialized */
> + match = of_match_node(qcom_cpufreq_ipq806x_match_list, root);
Aren't you re-implementing matching machine? Or actually - the socinfo
driver? You are doing the matching of compatible into SOC ID second
time. Just do it once - via socinfo driver.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-05 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 14:06 [PATCH v3 0/1] cpufreq: qcom: handle ipq806x with no SMEM Christian Marangi
2025-11-04 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add compatible fallback for ipq806x for " Christian Marangi
2025-11-04 14:15 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-11-05 8:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-11-05 9:12 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-11-05 9:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-05 10:27 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3f2810f-7361-4a23-adb3-32a73ad50519@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ilia.lin@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox