Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] dt-bindings: arm: Add support for Qualcomm TGU trace

[Songwei Chai <songwei.chai@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 11/5/2025 5:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/11/2025 09:49, Songwei Chai wrote:
>> On 11/5/2025 4:15 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2025 09:11, Songwei Chai wrote:
>>>> On 11/5/2025 3:49 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 10:40:37PM -0800, Songwei Chai wrote:
>>>>>> The Trigger Generation Unit (TGU) is designed to detect patterns or
>>>>>> sequences within a specific region of the System on Chip (SoC). Once
>>>>>> configured and activated, it monitors sense inputs and can detect a
>>>>>> pre-programmed state or sequence across clock cycles, subsequently
>>>>>> producing a trigger.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I do not understand: You got review which you ignored and then you
>>>>> removed pieces of this code to make it incorrect. Go back to previous
>>>>> versions so you won't waste our time re-doing review.
>>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>>
>>>> The previous reviewed-by is no longer applicable because in this
>>>> version, we moved
>>>>
>>>> the driver from /drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ to
>>>> /drivers/hwtracing/qcom/. This means the
>>>>
>>>> required compatible has changed from "/qcom,coresight-tgu/" to "/qcom,tgu/".
>>>>
>>>> Since this involves changes to devicetree binding, i didn't not carry
>>>> over the previous review tags.
>>> And which part of changelog explains the exact reasons to drop review
>>> tags? Not mentioning that changelog is almost impossible to find, buried
>>> under 10 pages of some repetitive introduction
>>>
>>> Did you read submitting patches?
>> As I mentioned above, the |compatible| string in this version has
>> changed compared to
>>
>> the previously reviewed binding. Therefore, I believe it's a default
>> rule that the previous
>>
>> |Reviewed-by|tags are no longer applicable. If the community requires a
>> note in the changelog to explain this,
>>
>> I will make sure to include it in the next version.
>>
>>
>> “
>>
>> Did you read submitting patches?
>>
>> ”
>>
>> Yes, the explanations in the cover letter were written by me, so I have
>> definitely read them. All of these explanatory documents are
>>
>
> Heh, why I am even reviewing this... you indicated in your address list
> that you do not wish review from me, so I will keep that in mind and not
> provide review.

Hi Krzysztof,

Apologies - I just realized i forgot to include you in the To list earlier.

Your input has always been valuable and welcome to me and i've learned a 
lot from our past discussions.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof