Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: swboyd@chromium.org, mka@chromium.org,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Fix cpufreq_driver->get() for non-LMH systems
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 23:45:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df4da23b-d589-7353-65b0-bedbd6c31412@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7968db3b-8545-0601-4302-301a4006f3bc@linaro.org>



On 2.02.2023 23:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2.02.2023 23:00, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>> On a sc7180-based Chromebook, when I go to
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq I can see:
>>
>>   cpuinfo_cur_freq:2995200
>>   cpuinfo_max_freq:1804800
>>   scaling_available_frequencies:300000 576000 ... 1708800 1804800
>>   scaling_cur_freq:1804800
>>   scaling_max_freq:1804800
>>
>> As you can see the `cpuinfo_cur_freq` is bogus. It turns out that this
>> bogus info started showing up as of commit 205f5e984d30 ("cpufreq:
>> qcom-hw: Fix the frequency returned by cpufreq_driver->get()"). That
>> commit seems to assume that everyone is on the LMH bandwagon, but
>> sc7180 isn't.
>>
>> Let's go back to the old code in the case where LMH isn't used.
>>
>> Fixes: 205f5e984d30 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: Fix the frequency returned by cpufreq_driver->get()")
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> ---
> Actually I hit the exact same issue when working on CPRh-aware
> cpufreq with manual OSM programming.. LMh gets enabled by the firmware
> on most recent platforms, but it's not the case for some old-timers.
> 
Ignore this email, I can't read.

Konrad
> I figured that adding a bool broken_lmh_freq in driver data would be
> a good middleground between reverting that patch and ignoring the
> issue, because it *does* matter what this function reports on LMh-
> enabled platforms (yes, the subsystems are bluepilled between each
> other and OSM/EPSS does not know the *real* throttled frequency),
> but obviously we don't want to report 2.99Ghz otherwise..
> 
> I think 7280 had an issue where a SoC-specific compatible was not
> introduced when the DT part was first merged, same goes for 6115.
> 6115 does have firmware-enabled LMh, not sure about 7280. In case
> you wanted to go that route, I think it would be suitable to add
> a blacklist of retroactively-broken platforms (match-by-machine-
> compatible; don't scream at me bindings folks, I guess that's the
> least messy solution) in addition to either matching the SoC-specific
> compatible to epss_broken_lmh_driver_data.
> 
> Or we can forget about old DTs and just bind qcom,sc7180-cpufreq-hw
> (and 7280, maybe? please check.) to this new driver data without
> checking the machine compatible.
> 
> 
> 
> Konrad
>>
>>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> index 9505a812d6a1..957cf6bb8c05 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> @@ -143,40 +143,42 @@ static unsigned long qcom_lmh_get_throttle_freq(struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data)
>>  	return lval * xo_rate;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/* Get the current frequency of the CPU (after throttling) */
>> -static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
>> +/* Get the frequency requested by the cpufreq core for the CPU */
>> +static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_get_freq(unsigned int cpu)
>>  {
>>  	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
>> +	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
>>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>> +	unsigned int index;
>>  
>>  	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
>>  	if (!policy)
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>>  	data = policy->driver_data;
>> +	soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
>>  
>> -	return qcom_lmh_get_throttle_freq(data) / HZ_PER_KHZ;
>> +	index = readl_relaxed(data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
>> +	index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
>> +
>> +	return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/* Get the frequency requested by the cpufreq core for the CPU */
>> -static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_get_freq(unsigned int cpu)
>> +static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_get(unsigned int cpu)
>>  {
>>  	struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data;
>> -	const struct qcom_cpufreq_soc_data *soc_data;
>>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>> -	unsigned int index;
>>  
>>  	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
>>  	if (!policy)
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>>  	data = policy->driver_data;
>> -	soc_data = qcom_cpufreq.soc_data;
>>  
>> -	index = readl_relaxed(data->base + soc_data->reg_perf_state);
>> -	index = min(index, LUT_MAX_ENTRIES - 1);
>> +	if (data->throttle_irq >= 0)
>> +		return qcom_lmh_get_throttle_freq(data) / HZ_PER_KHZ;
>>  
>> -	return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
>> +	return qcom_cpufreq_get_freq(cpu);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-02 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-02 22:00 [PATCH] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Fix cpufreq_driver->get() for non-LMH systems Douglas Anderson
2023-02-02 22:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-02 22:45   ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2023-02-02 23:38 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-02-04 14:58 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-06  4:10 ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df4da23b-d589-7353-65b0-bedbd6c31412@linaro.org \
    --to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox