From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A4727F4CA; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772098554; cv=none; b=SaH9dLqpAB6vx9v50hJvSGqTxWekyFkvfe6D6GHdqoUJim/jCmp+leV3i84PctLCum8OADWX6vkVbjEKK/RfZpEEO2bY3JPm21l6sQN4rSP0BXkYOdxn9jRq5qBo+W70bcOIzEkESkC57vJOFDE9Qv8LCsvEQYuxZQbyCLte12g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772098554; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D5cEhfkk+LS+RkHszu82ZDd0Fjkauhn5RcU1rKkqBGs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WlHr1RxJHuHBqeZOZrH95oxL+fPLmRpUPV2OdyHO0RbdHwhCTlvkUSpM219K3Jmfpok1KKOB7qQcGD7EM0ggjXi8x6S1+/lz5n0fVDOl+mu+pH23H57Sa4F6IFGzIpBs40NUs30uJoE6icQStxQhqXVOEU1taRdJaKgtTYvqlcg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sH2H2F8l; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sH2H2F8l" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E95F2C19424; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:35:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772098554; bh=D5cEhfkk+LS+RkHszu82ZDd0Fjkauhn5RcU1rKkqBGs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=sH2H2F8l5rnWitV2agYm7GmJKBPfYhTQ2b0egmmUP5yV5ZNUXzO/UWod/YJWNZiSD yASzVeRhLn23h+xwOUy84yGc0cR/GYHZrrIBa4mxlhyfRs8Kp6qThG9755sr6JGK2J IqrLBj7y/w0TqkYdOmKoEK3sUe8x9sCvk8BDMTOwGnTeCw073sT+NtltKhyz9+f08e E5pg4Qdi5hWoIz/OaiG7PgKg7lNDObeUOxOHVmoz2YsZ3zrbHN3JXmV6FzW9lxCaOQ LznTidF5XS4DSRXm7nRgLyuZMoAwT2kYPzOnnltcYxzvle0+jOOeb1jbtZDmtvjrdI CJkLMFoiA0Vmw== Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:35:47 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/18] dt-bindings: media: qcom,x1e80100-camss: Assign correct main register bank to first address To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Robert Foss , Todor Tomov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Konrad Dybcio , Vladimir Zapolskiy , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org References: <20260225-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v8-0-95517393bcb2@linaro.org> <20260225-b4-linux-next-25-03-13-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v8-1-95517393bcb2@linaro.org> <6JLP5a_yJmhmmwSmtFoMmzlT3Gh5yhHVpVSRTqDb93I2_KFB6-p_6mKmGKaqtStt2bbVPqQ16j0Sfp2Z-LvhlQ==@protonmail.internalid> <20260226-resourceful-pelican-of-defense-437c7e@quoll> <13853dc8-1a54-4cfd-b801-f23d88be4a88@kernel.org> <5QUAno5rJaSIXrCTC1Y9QJOrrx2Pt1GGVJspvhutMHgSh6mcu5S6gsZHu3lOEVXjG7pqSyJjH6RB1wXRszZ-Mg==@protonmail.internalid> <860cb545-8283-4f2b-9f21-19d207ed7da3@kernel.org> From: Bryan O'Donoghue Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <860cb545-8283-4f2b-9f21-19d207ed7da3@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26/02/2026 09:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26/02/2026 10:25, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> On 26/02/2026 07:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> No, that's ABI break for no real reason. This ABI was shipped and there >>> is upstream (and maybe other) user of it. You cannot change it. >> >> We don't have an upstream user. The dtsi for CAMSS hasn't been committed. >> >> So this is changeable right ? > > No. You have user since v6.16 (or v6.15, don't remember). This is > released ABI. Yes but I distinctly remember us saying if we could prove there was no actual _user_ then a change was possible. Is that not the case ? --- bod