[PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Drop dead compile guard

[PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Drop dead compile guard

[Konrad Dybcio]

From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

SCSI_UFSHCD already selects DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND, drop the
check.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Is this something that could be discovered by our existing static
checkers?
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index 4bbe4de1679b908c85e6a3d4035fc9dcafcc0d1a..76fc70503a62eb2e747b2d4cd18cc05b6f5526c7 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -1898,7 +1898,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_device_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND)
 static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 					struct devfreq_dev_profile *p,
 					struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *d)
@@ -1910,13 +1909,6 @@ static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
 
 	hba->clk_scaling.suspend_on_no_request = true;
 }
-#else
-static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
-		struct devfreq_dev_profile *p,
-		struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *data)
-{
-}
-#endif
 
 /* Resources */
 static const struct ufshcd_res_info ufs_res_info[RES_MAX] = {

---
base-commit: a933d3dc1968fcfb0ab72879ec304b1971ed1b9a
change-id: 20250724-topic-ufs_compile_check-3378996f4221

Best regards,
-- 
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Drop dead compile guard

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 02:23:52PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> SCSI_UFSHCD already selects DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND, drop the
> check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Is this something that could be discovered by our existing static
> checkers?
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Drop dead compile guard

[Martin K. Petersen]

Konrad,

> SCSI_UFSHCD already selects DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND, drop the
> check.

Applied to 6.17/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Drop dead compile guard

[Dan Carpenter]

This patch removes some dead ifdeffed code because the KConfig has a
select which ensures that CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND is set.
Konrad was wondering if there are any tools to detect this sort of
thing.  I don't think so.  I think the only thing we detect are
non-existant configs.  But let me add a few more people to the CC who
might know.

regards,
dan carpenter

On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 02:23:52PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> SCSI_UFSHCD already selects DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND, drop the
> check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Is this something that could be discovered by our existing static
> checkers?
> ---
>  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 4bbe4de1679b908c85e6a3d4035fc9dcafcc0d1a..76fc70503a62eb2e747b2d4cd18cc05b6f5526c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -1898,7 +1898,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_device_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND)
>  static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>  					struct devfreq_dev_profile *p,
>  					struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *d)
> @@ -1910,13 +1909,6 @@ static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>  
>  	hba->clk_scaling.suspend_on_no_request = true;
>  }
> -#else
> -static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> -		struct devfreq_dev_profile *p,
> -		struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *data)
> -{
> -}
> -#endif
>  
>  /* Resources */
>  static const struct ufshcd_res_info ufs_res_info[RES_MAX] = {
> 
> ---
> base-commit: a933d3dc1968fcfb0ab72879ec304b1971ed1b9a
> change-id: 20250724-topic-ufs_compile_check-3378996f4221
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Drop dead compile guard

[Lukas Bulwahn]

On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 5:33 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> This patch removes some dead ifdeffed code because the KConfig has a
> select which ensures that CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND is set.
> Konrad was wondering if there are any tools to detect this sort of
> thing.  I don't think so.  I think the only thing we detect are
> non-existant configs.  But let me add a few more people to the CC who
> might know.
>

I also have a simple script to search for unused configs, but that is
just five lines of bash and then a lot of manual filtering.

If I would attempt to implement such already rather complex analysis,
I would start with looking at this tool:

https://github.com/paulgazz/kmax

Possibly, there is a good way to re-use some parts of it or extend it
to look for the pattern above.

Lukas

> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 02:23:52PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >
> > SCSI_UFSHCD already selects DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND, drop the
> > check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > Is this something that could be discovered by our existing static
> > checkers?
> > ---
> >  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 --------
> >  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > index 4bbe4de1679b908c85e6a3d4035fc9dcafcc0d1a..76fc70503a62eb2e747b2d4cd18cc05b6f5526c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > @@ -1898,7 +1898,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_device_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND)
> >  static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> >                                       struct devfreq_dev_profile *p,
> >                                       struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *d)
> > @@ -1910,13 +1909,6 @@ static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> >
> >       hba->clk_scaling.suspend_on_no_request = true;
> >  }
> > -#else
> > -static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > -             struct devfreq_dev_profile *p,
> > -             struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *data)
> > -{
> > -}
> > -#endif
> >
> >  /* Resources */
> >  static const struct ufshcd_res_info ufs_res_info[RES_MAX] = {
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: a933d3dc1968fcfb0ab72879ec304b1971ed1b9a
> > change-id: 20250724-topic-ufs_compile_check-3378996f4221
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Drop dead compile guard

[Julia Lawall]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2935 bytes --]



On Tue, 5 Aug 2025, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 5:33 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > This patch removes some dead ifdeffed code because the KConfig has a
> > select which ensures that CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND is set.
> > Konrad was wondering if there are any tools to detect this sort of
> > thing.  I don't think so.  I think the only thing we detect are
> > non-existant configs.  But let me add a few more people to the CC who
> > might know.
> >
>
> I also have a simple script to search for unused configs, but that is
> just five lines of bash and then a lot of manual filtering.
>
> If I would attempt to implement such already rather complex analysis,
> I would start with looking at this tool:
>
> https://github.com/paulgazz/kmax
>
> Possibly, there is a good way to re-use some parts of it or extend it
> to look for the pattern above.

If there are ideas for improvement of kmax, I'm sure Paul would be happy
to hear about them.

julia

>
> Lukas
>
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 02:23:52PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > > From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > >
> > > SCSI_UFSHCD already selects DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND, drop the
> > > check.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > > Is this something that could be discovered by our existing static
> > > checkers?
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 8 --------
> > >  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > index 4bbe4de1679b908c85e6a3d4035fc9dcafcc0d1a..76fc70503a62eb2e747b2d4cd18cc05b6f5526c7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > > @@ -1898,7 +1898,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_device_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > >       return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND)
> > >  static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > >                                       struct devfreq_dev_profile *p,
> > >                                       struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *d)
> > > @@ -1910,13 +1909,6 @@ static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > >
> > >       hba->clk_scaling.suspend_on_no_request = true;
> > >  }
> > > -#else
> > > -static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > > -             struct devfreq_dev_profile *p,
> > > -             struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data *data)
> > > -{
> > > -}
> > > -#endif
> > >
> > >  /* Resources */
> > >  static const struct ufshcd_res_info ufs_res_info[RES_MAX] = {
> > >
> > > ---
> > > base-commit: a933d3dc1968fcfb0ab72879ec304b1971ed1b9a
> > > change-id: 20250724-topic-ufs_compile_check-3378996f4221
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > --
> > > Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
>