From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:56:09 -0700 Subject: [rft, PATCH v2 00/36] pinctrl: Clean up and add missed headers In-Reply-To: <20221010201453.77401-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20221010201453.77401-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <0684f480-2092-d520-2c8e-bd9a2dca47e3@gmail.com> List-Id: To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/10/2022 1:14 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Currently the header inclusion inside the pinctrl headers seems more arbitrary > than logical. This series is basically out of two parts: > - add missed headers to the pin control drivers / users > - clean up the headers of pin control subsystem > > The idea is to have this series to be pulled after -rc1 by the GPIO and > pin control subsystems, so all new drivers will utilize cleaned up headers > of the pin control. > > Please, review and comment. Did you really need to split this on a per-driver basis as opposed to just a treewide drivers/pinctrl, drivers/media and drivers/gpiolib patch set? 36 patches seems needlessly high when 4 patches could have achieve the same outcome. -- Florian