Linux-Aspeed Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "M, Krishnamoorthi" <krishnamoorthi.m@amd.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	broonie@kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	akshata.mukundshetty@amd.com, bleung@chromium.org,
	groeck@chromium.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
	corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, andrew@codeconstruct.com.au,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] espi: add core bus framework
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:20:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f7469b8-8275-4061-b336-97cbce41ff82@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anSGjRK8spayFnKw@monoceros>

Hi,

On 8/6/2026 7:01 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 05:22:56PM +0530, Krishnamoorthi M wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/espi/Kconfig b/drivers/espi/Kconfig
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..4411d8336e82
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/espi/Kconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +#
>> +# eSPI (Enhanced Serial Peripheral Interface) bus configuration
>> +#
>> +
>> +menuconfig ESPI
>> +	bool "eSPI (Enhanced Serial Peripheral Interface) bus support"
> 
> Can this be tristate instead?

Yes. CONFIG_SPI is bool, but CONFIG_I2C and CONFIG_I3C are both 
tristate, allowing the bus framework to be built as a module. Given that 
eSPI controller and slave drivers are expected to be modular, tristate 
is the better fit and is consistent with the majority of comparable bus 
frameworks.

> 
>> +	help
>> +	  Enhanced Serial Peripheral Interface (eSPI) bus framework.
>> +
>> [...]
>> +const struct bus_type espi_bus_type = {
>> +	.name	= "espi",
>> +	.match	= espi_bus_match,
>> +	.uevent	= espi_bus_uevent,
>> +	.probe	= espi_bus_probe,
>> +	.remove	= espi_bus_remove,
>> +};
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_bus_type);
> 
> Do you really need this exported?

Yes, it is required. Controller and slave drivers built as modules 
reference espi_bus_type directly when registering devices. Without the 
export they fail to link.

> 
>> +static ssize_t supported_channels_show(struct device *dev,
>> +				       struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct espi_controller *ctrl = to_espi_controller(dev);
>> +
>> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%02x\n", ctrl->caps.supported_channels);
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(supported_channels);
>> +
>> +static ssize_t max_freq_mhz_show(struct device *dev,
>> +				 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct espi_controller *ctrl = to_espi_controller(dev);
>> +
>> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", ctrl->caps.max_freq_mhz);
> 
> Is the unit here mHz or MHz? Maybe pick a better name that answers this
> question.

The value is in MHz. we will rename the attribute to make the unit explicit.

> 
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(max_freq_mhz);
>> +
>> +static ssize_t io_mode_show(struct device *dev,
>> +			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct espi_controller *ctrl = to_espi_controller(dev);
>> +	static const char * const modes[] = { "single", "dual", "quad" };
>> +	u8 m = ctrl->caps.io_mode;
>> +
>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(m > ESPI_IO_MODE_QUAD))
>> +		return sysfs_emit(buf, "unknown\n");
>> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", modes[m]);
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(io_mode);
>> +
>> +static ssize_t channel_enabled_show(struct device *dev,
>> +				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	struct espi_controller *ctrl = to_espi_controller(dev);
>> +
>> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%02x\n", READ_ONCE(ctrl->channel_enabled));
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(channel_enabled);
>> +
>> +static struct attribute *espi_controller_attrs[] = {
>> +	&dev_attr_supported_channels.attr,
>> +	&dev_attr_max_freq_mhz.attr,
>> +	&dev_attr_io_mode.attr,
>> +	&dev_attr_channel_enabled.attr,
>> +	NULL,
> 
> No , after the list terminator please.

Ack.

> 
>> +};
>> +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(espi_controller);
>> +
>> +static void espi_controller_release(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct espi_controller *ctrl = to_espi_controller(dev);
>> +
>> +	mutex_destroy(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	mutex_destroy(&ctrl->device_list_lock);
>> +	kfree(ctrl);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct device_type espi_controller_type = {
>> +	.groups	 = espi_controller_groups,
>> +	.release = espi_controller_release,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct espi_controller *espi_controller_alloc(struct device *parent,
>> +					      unsigned int size)
>> +{
>> +	struct espi_controller *ctrl;
>> +
>> +	if (!parent)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> +	ctrl = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctrl) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> You might want to align sizeof(*ctrl) to something like
> ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, to ensure that devdata below is aligned
> appropriately. Also use size_add() instead of direct arithmetic with
> sizes.
> 

Agreed. I'll align the private-data offset with 
dma_get_cache_alignment() like SPI does and use size_add() for the 
allocation size. Will fix it.

>> +	if (!ctrl)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> +	device_initialize(&ctrl->dev);
>> +	ctrl->dev.parent = parent;
>> +	ctrl->dev.type = &espi_controller_type;
>> +
>> +	mutex_init(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctrl->device_list);
>> +	mutex_init(&ctrl->device_list_lock);
>> +	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&ctrl->notifier_list);
>> +
>> +	if (size)
>> +		espi_controller_set_devdata(ctrl, (void *)ctrl + sizeof(*ctrl));
>> +
>> +	return ctrl;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_controller_alloc);
>> +
>> +int espi_controller_register(struct espi_controller *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	u32 id;
>> +
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	ret = xa_alloc(&espi_controllers, &id, ctrl, xa_limit_31b,
>> +		       GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	ctrl->bus_num = id;
>> +	ret = dev_set_name(&ctrl->dev, "espi%d", ctrl->bus_num);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_erase;
>> +
>> +	if (ctrl->ops->setup) {
>> +		ret = ctrl->ops->setup(ctrl);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "controller setup failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +			goto err_erase;
>> +		}
>> +	}
> 
> is ops->setup supposed to be only called in espi_controller_register()?
> If yes, why does it exist? The driver specific stuff in it can just be
> done before espi_controller_register() is called, can it not?

You're right. ops->setup is only called from espi_controller_register() 
and nothing in it needs core state, so drivers can do that work before 
calling register. I will drop it.

> 
>> +	ret = device_add(&ctrl->dev);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "device_add failed: %d\n", ret);
> 
> Better use %pe for error codes.

Noted. Will change it.

> 
>> +		if (ctrl->ops->cleanup)
>> +			ctrl->ops->cleanup(ctrl);
>> +		goto err_erase;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dev_info(&ctrl->dev, "registered: channels=0x%02x freq=%uMHz\n",
>> +		 ctrl->caps.supported_channels, ctrl->caps.max_freq_mhz);
> 
> Please degrade that to dev_dbg. We're already have too many messages
> during boot that are not really usefull once driver/subsystem debugging
> is done.
> 
> Also I'd add a space between "%u" and "MHz".
> 

Sure. I will change it to dev_dbg() and add the space.

>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_erase:
>> +	xa_erase(&espi_controllers, ctrl->bus_num);
>> +	ctrl->bus_num = -1;
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_controller_register);
>> +
>> +void espi_controller_unregister(struct espi_controller *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl)
>> +		return;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Remove from the lookup table before dropping the device reference,
>> +	 * so a concurrent espi_controller_get_by_bus_num() can never take a
>> +	 * reference on a controller that is going away.
>> +	 */
>> +	xa_erase(&espi_controllers, ctrl->bus_num);
>> +	if (ctrl->ops && ctrl->ops->cleanup)
>> +		ctrl->ops->cleanup(ctrl);
>> +	device_unregister(&ctrl->dev);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_controller_unregister);
>> +
>> +void espi_controller_put(struct espi_controller *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	if (ctrl)
>> +		put_device(&ctrl->dev);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_controller_put);
>> +
>> +struct espi_controller *espi_controller_get_by_bus_num(int bus_num)
>> +{
>> +	struct espi_controller *ctrl;
>> +
>> +	guard(spinlock)(&espi_controllers.xa_lock);
>> +	ctrl = xa_load(&espi_controllers, bus_num);
>> +	if (ctrl)
>> +		get_device(&ctrl->dev);
>> +	return ctrl;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_controller_get_by_bus_num);
>> +
>> +int espi_get_capabilities(struct espi_controller *ctrl,
>> +			  struct espi_capabilities *caps)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !caps)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	*caps = ctrl->caps;
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_get_capabilities);
>> +
>> +bool espi_channel_is_enabled(struct espi_controller *ctrl, u8 channel)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || channel >= ESPI_CHANNEL_COUNT)
>> +		return false;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return !!(ctrl->channel_enabled & BIT(channel));
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_channel_is_enabled);
>> +
>> +int espi_get_configuration(struct espi_controller *ctrl,
>> +			   u32 slave_reg_addr, u32 *config)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->get_configuration)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	if (!config)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->get_configuration(ctrl, slave_reg_addr, config);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_get_configuration);
>> +
>> +int espi_set_configuration(struct espi_controller *ctrl,
>> +			   u32 slave_reg_addr, u32 config)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->set_configuration)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->set_configuration(ctrl, slave_reg_addr, config);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_set_configuration);
>> +
>> +int espi_inband_reset(struct espi_controller *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->inband_reset)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->inband_reset(ctrl);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_inband_reset);
>> +
>> +int espi_get_status(struct espi_controller *ctrl,
>> +		    struct espi_slave_status *status)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->get_status)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	if (!status)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->get_status(ctrl, status);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_get_status);
>> +
>> +int espi_enable_channel(struct espi_controller *ctrl, u8 channel)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->enable_channel)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	if (channel >= ESPI_CHANNEL_COUNT)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	ret = ctrl->ops->enable_channel(ctrl, channel);
>> +	if (!ret)
>> +		ctrl->channel_enabled |= BIT(channel);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_enable_channel);
>> +
>> +int espi_disable_channel(struct espi_controller *ctrl, u8 channel)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->disable_channel)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	if (channel >= ESPI_CHANNEL_COUNT)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	ret = ctrl->ops->disable_channel(ctrl, channel);
>> +	if (!ret)
>> +		ctrl->channel_enabled &= ~BIT(channel);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_disable_channel);
>> +
>> +int espi_periph_io_read(struct espi_controller *ctrl,
>> +			u16 port, u8 width, u32 *value)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->periph_io_read)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->periph_io_read(ctrl, port, width, value);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_periph_io_read);
>> +
>> +int espi_periph_io_write(struct espi_controller *ctrl,
>> +			 u16 port, u8 width, u32 value)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->periph_io_write)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->periph_io_write(ctrl, port, width, value);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_periph_io_write);
>> +
>> +int espi_periph_mem_read(struct espi_controller *ctrl,
>> +			 u32 addr, void *buf, size_t len)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->periph_mem_read)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->periph_mem_read(ctrl, addr, buf, len);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_periph_mem_read);
>> +
>> +int espi_periph_mem_write(struct espi_controller *ctrl,
>> +			  u32 addr, const void *buf, size_t len)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->periph_mem_write)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->periph_mem_write(ctrl, addr, buf, len);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_periph_mem_write);
>> +
>> +int espi_vwire_get(struct espi_controller *ctrl, u8 index, u8 *value, u8 *valid)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->vwire_get)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->vwire_get(ctrl, index, value, valid);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_vwire_get);
>> +
>> +int espi_vwire_put(struct espi_controller *ctrl, u8 index, u8 value, u8 valid)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->vwire_put)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->vwire_put(ctrl, index, value, valid);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_vwire_put);
>> +
>> +int espi_oob_send(struct espi_controller *ctrl, const void *buf, size_t len, u8 tag)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->oob_send)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->oob_send(ctrl, buf, len, tag);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_oob_send);
>> +
>> +int espi_oob_recv(struct espi_controller *ctrl, void *buf, size_t *len, u8 *tag)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->oob_recv)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->oob_recv(ctrl, buf, len, tag);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_oob_recv);
>> +
>> +int espi_flash_read(struct espi_controller *ctrl, u32 offset, void *buf, size_t len)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->flash_read)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->flash_read(ctrl, offset, buf, len);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_flash_read);
>> +
>> +int espi_flash_write(struct espi_controller *ctrl, u32 offset, const void *buf, size_t len)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->flash_write)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->flash_write(ctrl, offset, buf, len);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_flash_write);
>> +
>> +int espi_flash_erase(struct espi_controller *ctrl, u32 offset, size_t len)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->flash_erase)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	guard(mutex)(&ctrl->lock);
>> +	return ctrl->ops->flash_erase(ctrl, offset, len);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_flash_erase);
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * espi_handle_alert - dispatch a hardware alert to the controller
>> + *
>> + * Must be called from process context (threaded IRQ or workqueue).
>> + *
>> + * ctrl->lock is NOT held across ops->handle_alert so that the driver
>> + * callback can call espi_notify_event() without deadlocking: notifier
>> + * callbacks may in turn call channel APIs that also acquire ctrl->lock.
>> + * The driver is responsible for taking ctrl->lock around any register
>> + * accesses that need serialisation with the channel API.
>> + */
>> +int espi_handle_alert(struct espi_controller *ctrl)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ctrl || !ctrl->ops || !ctrl->ops->handle_alert)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	return ctrl->ops->handle_alert(ctrl);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_handle_alert);
>> +
>> +int __espi_register_driver(struct module *owner, struct espi_driver *drv)
>> +{
>> +	drv->driver.owner = owner;
>> +	drv->driver.bus = &espi_bus_type;
>> +	return driver_register(&drv->driver);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__espi_register_driver);
>> +
>> +void espi_unregister_driver(struct espi_driver *drv)
>> +{
>> +	driver_unregister(&drv->driver);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(espi_unregister_driver);
>> +
>> +static int __init espi_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = bus_register(&espi_bus_type);
>> +
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		pr_err("failed to register eSPI bus: %d\n", ret);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +postcore_initcall(espi_init);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Krishnamoorthi M <krishnamoorthi.m@amd.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("eSPI core framework");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> diff --git a/include/linux/espi/espi.h b/include/linux/espi/espi.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..a191ddc10cdd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/espi/espi.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>> +/*
>> + * eSPI (Enhanced Serial Peripheral Interface) framework
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + * All Rights Reserved.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef _LINUX_ESPI_ESPI_H
>> +#define _LINUX_ESPI_ESPI_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/bits.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> 
> Please don't include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>. I think you're not even
> using a symbol defined by it, so you can just drop it.

Ack.

> 
>> [...]
>> +struct espi_device_id {
>> +	char name[ESPI_NAME_SIZE];
>> +	kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
> 
> There is an effort to replace .driver_data by an anonymous union for the
> already existing *_device_id. See
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1780048925.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com/
> for details. It would be awesome if you'd do that from the start.

Sure. Will change it. Thanks for the pointer.

Thanks,
Krishna
> 
>> +};
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe



  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 11:52 [RFC PATCH 0/4] espi: introduce eSPI bus framework Krishnamoorthi M
2026-08-04 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] espi: add core " Krishnamoorthi M
2026-08-06 13:31   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-08-12 12:50     ` M, Krishnamoorthi [this message]
2026-08-12 16:30       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-08-04 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] espi: add slave device model and event notification Krishnamoorthi M
2026-08-04 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] Documentation: espi: add subsystem overview and MAINTAINERS entry Krishnamoorthi M
2026-08-04 16:39   ` Randy Dunlap
2026-08-04 19:14     ` M, Krishnamoorthi
2026-08-04 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] espi: amd: add AMD eSPI controller driver Krishnamoorthi M
2026-08-04 12:18 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] espi: introduce eSPI bus framework Greg KH
2026-08-04 13:26   ` Greg KH
2026-08-05  0:42   ` Andrew Jeffery
2026-08-05 18:35     ` M, Krishnamoorthi
2026-08-10  6:13       ` YH Chung
2026-08-05 10:14   ` M, Krishnamoorthi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0f7469b8-8275-4061-b336-97cbce41ff82@amd.com \
    --to=krishnamoorthi.m@amd.com \
    --cc=akshata.mukundshetty@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=groeck@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox