From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:25:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH arm/aspeed/ast2500 v2] eSPI: add ASPEED AST2500 eSPI driver to boot a host with PCH runs on eSPI In-Reply-To: <1519369459-12468-1-git-send-email-haiyue.wang@linux.intel.com> References: <1519369459-12468-1-git-send-email-haiyue.wang@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <1519381535.10722.99.camel@linux.intel.com> List-Id: To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 15:04 +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote: > When PCH works under eSPI mode, the PMC (Power Management Controller) > in > PCH is waiting for SUS_ACK from BMC after it alerts SUS_WARN. It is in > dead loop if no SUS_ACK assert. This is the basic requirement for the > BMC > works as eSPI slave. So, do we have an agreement that the driver should go in this shape w/o interacting with SPI subsystem? Also few comments below. > +config ASPEED_ESPI_SLAVE > + depends on (ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST) && REGMAP_MMIO I would rather split this to two depends on REGMAP_MMIO depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST > + tristate "Aspeed ast2500 eSPI slave device driver" > + ---help--- > + Control Aspeed ast2500 eSPI slave controller to handle > event > + which needs the firmware's processing. > +#include What exactly requires this header? > +static int aspeed_espi_slave_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct aspeed_espi_slave_data *priv; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct resource *res; > + void __iomem *regs; > + int rc; > + > + dev_set_name(dev, DEVICE_NAME); Do this after checks and memory allocations. > + > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > + if (IS_ERR(regs)) > + return PTR_ERR(regs); > + > + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!priv) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + priv->map = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, regs, > &espi_slave_regmap_cfg); > + if (IS_ERR(priv->map)) > + return PTR_ERR(priv->map); > + > +static const struct of_device_id of_espi_slave_match_table[] = { > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-espi-slave" }, > + { } > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_espi_slave_match_table); This one should be closer to the struct of_device_id. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy