From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 09:48:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] thermal: Introduce
 devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register
In-Reply-To: <1555617500-10862-2-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
References: <1555617500-10862-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <1555617500-10862-2-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <20190501164843.GA16333@roeck-us.net>
List-Id: <linux-aspeed.lists.ozlabs.org>
To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:58:15PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> thermal_of_cooling_device_register() and thermal_cooling_device_register()
> are typically called from driver probe functions, and
> thermal_cooling_device_unregister() is called from remove functions. This
> makes both a perfect candidate for device managed functions.
> 
> Introduce devm_thermal_of_cooling_device_register(). This function can
> also be used to replace thermal_cooling_device_register() by passing a NULL
> pointer as device node. The new function requires both struct device *
> and struct device_node * as parameters since the struct device_node *
> parameter is not always identical to dev->of_node.
> 
> Don't introduce a device managed remove function since it is not needed
> at this point.
> 

Any feedback / thoughts / comments ?

Thanks,
Guenter