From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] drivers: usb: remove usage of list iterator past the loop body
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:18:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220228131844.GD2812@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E31E215E-C409-40B8-8452-57E70C91484C@gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:03:36PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> >> @@ -954,7 +957,6 @@ net2272_dequeue(struct usb_ep *_ep, struct usb_request *_req)
> >> dev_dbg(ep->dev->dev, "unlink (%s) pio\n", _ep->name);
> >> net2272_done(ep, req, -ECONNRESET);
> >> }
> >> - req = NULL;
> >
> > Another unrelated change. These are all good changes but send them as
> > separate patches.
>
> You are referring to the req = NULL, right?
Yes.
>
> I've changed the use of 'req' in the same function and assumed that I can
> just remove the unnecessary statement. But if it's better to do separately
> I'll do that.
>
These are all changes which made me pause during my review to figure out
why they were necessary. The line between what is a related part of a
patch is a bit vague and some maintainers will ask you to add or subtract
from a patch depending on their individual tastes. I don't really have
an exact answer, but I felt like this patch needs to be subtracted from.
Especially if there is a whole chunk of the patch which can be removed,
then to me, that obviously should be in a different patch.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-28 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-28 11:08 [PATCH 0/6] Remove usage of list iterator past the loop body Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 1/6] drivers: usb: remove " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 12:03 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 13:18 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2022-02-28 18:20 ` Joe Perches
2022-03-01 5:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:20 ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 12:06 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:37 ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 12:19 ` Christian König
2022-02-28 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:53 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:27 ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 23:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:14 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 3:03 ` David Laight
2022-02-28 21:47 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 0:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 6:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01 11:28 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:36 ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:40 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:58 ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 18:21 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 9:31 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02 14:04 ` David Laight
2022-03-03 2:27 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 4:58 ` David Laight
2022-03-03 7:26 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-03-03 12:37 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:18 ` [Kgdb-bugreport] " Daniel Thompson
2022-03-04 6:59 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 7:32 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03 8:30 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 8:38 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-02-28 20:07 ` Christian König
2022-02-28 20:42 ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:56 ` Christian König
2022-02-28 21:13 ` James Bottomley
2022-03-01 7:03 ` Christian König
2022-02-28 22:05 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:18 ` Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 22:28 ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:50 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2022-03-01 0:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 22:58 ` David Laight
2022-03-01 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:19 ` David Laight
2022-03-01 23:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 9:29 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02 20:07 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:59 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-03 8:37 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01 2:15 ` David Laight
2022-02-28 13:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 3/6] treewide: fix incorrect use to determine if list is empty Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:38 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] drivers: remove unnecessary use of list iterator variable Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] treewide: remove dereference of list iterator after loop body Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 6/6] treewide: remove check of list iterator against head past the " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:22 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 13:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-07 15:00 ` [PATCH 0/6] Remove usage of list iterator " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:26 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220228131844.GD2812@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).