From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:29:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc In-Reply-To: References: <20240625022306.2568122-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn> Message-ID: <2024062541-disdain-essay-7434@gregkh> List-Id: To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:00:15PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host > > may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array. > > Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description? > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94 > > > > Found by static analysis. > > Were any special tools involved? > > > How do you think about to add any tags (like ?Fixes? and ?Cc?) accordingly? Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot