From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:32:48 -0700
Subject: [RFC PATCH i2c-next 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: Add
 'idle-wait-timeout-ms' setting
In-Reply-To: <20180926162701.GB2736@kunai>
References: <20180910214519.14126-1-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
 <20180910214519.14126-2-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
 <a81a6092-a9d0-78d5-3596-cddc5d6a0713@linux.intel.com>
 <20180924215850.GD18592@kunai>
 <2c8563fd-0641-5237-0026-f559c480ad91@linux.intel.com>
 <20180925082717.GB2270@kunai>
 <7b4e5715-3a87-8f77-8d0d-4647f02c87a8@linux.intel.com>
 <f20a2e1d-e1db-1e63-3df8-ad650b931f7d@linux.intel.com>
 <20180926162701.GB2736@kunai>
Message-ID: <3b5c4322-291a-c11b-a2ee-6256ba7441df@linux.intel.com>
List-Id: <linux-aspeed.lists.ozlabs.org>
To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 9/26/2018 9:27 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> Should I use timeout in struct i2c_adapter instead just like i2c-mpc
>> does?
> 
> I would accept that.
> 

Okay, I will submit a new patch set. Thanks!

Jae