From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81BCAC531D0 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 07:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4h7qQ75dbhz2yhD; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:06:23 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.180 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1785116257; cv=none; b=RMiNXH2F391B3/qJZm40vWH639zHyx2REgeEfM1fQrzbWtO/IYcU1oV0zbqnL4WoeRGF4Fcvl82sQTBDCyqgSBWHWbXIZQCnZ0Pi+PMCIaA2DxavCnYGzpvqRxm0CsbZQJQgaBXudOfbwB03WO8r8XXvGqYsQFkSQM05qYjRWzInxpsN9Ro24hnb5B3fhJIGy9OkoXy/403DtxKQX7UN+p0CO67lqoGDjhAV3C2ci1IJ/MQSccTWGm/sed1iacp3My9jcfE556l3HDXGd4BtHOTaOW+ovzPhuAteLI9F2ms5EfdD7a56Ro9ONh77iJcEoLILKCbR3QgO23XpCe514A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1785116257; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=o3I//fWT/Ahu1TRVuSuKOsa5VptGAjlzU/RAQ0KA2Gs=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=kUjCmWS1O5iXf9JCp04DfiD9/khFfk3k3k8O98UYQzGN5on/LS3nkoLNk/JVDhB3f5x/82Rzsx2q82+xEuyqz3nf6bsBOwSUThtWQv20w6A4CwDX+bBKWEfb3IGW4vr02VnBQtfbdogn9aHWn91okvPVNKuUq+7tnXlpHs7oyW3Y0SGIS0iSnWx/7cfeZ2c2V9kJ8g0fn/6OxLDE0P53Vv8RdBehGQByU4kjcNx8DOvAbsBliLSuCsODlfjK8ji/qYoowRrTXYNFNBqLT9cu0+c95ZQO9QI9UMC1lRhSdZfRgkS2hP5+EhpK6NsjOUGXxv/+ZnsIZNM01eHPU+miFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=oss.qualcomm.com; spf=pass (client-ip=91.218.175.180; helo=out-180.mta0.migadu.com; envelope-from=huang.ze@linux.dev; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=oss.qualcomm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev (client-ip=91.218.175.180; helo=out-180.mta0.migadu.com; envelope-from=huang.ze@linux.dev; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from out-180.mta0.migadu.com (out-180.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4h7h6m57z8z2yPR for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:37:35 +1000 (AEST) X-Mailing-List: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:37:03 +0800 Message-Id: Cc: "Alexey Brodkin" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "Joel Stanley" , "Andrew Jeffery" , "Frank Li" , "Sascha Hauer" , "Pengutronix Kernel Team" , "Fabio Estevam" , "Hans de Goede" , "Alex Lanzano" , "Oleksandr Andrushchenko" , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] drm: replace simple display pipe users with atomic helpers X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Ze Huang" To: "Linus Walleij" , "Ze Huang" References: <20260727-drm-simple-kms-removal-v3-0-cd5dc89858c6@oss.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Mon Jul 27, 2026 at 4:32 AM CST, Linus Walleij wrote: > Hi Ze, > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 9:45=E2=80=AFPM Ze Huang wrote: > >> struct drm_simple_display_pipe was meant to simplify simple DRM >> drivers, but instead adds an extra wrapper around normal DRM atomic >> helper setup. As noted in Documentation/gpu/todo.rst, remaining users >> should be converted to regular atomic helpers and stop depending on the >> simple-KMS interfaces. > > Are these patches independent of other stuff so they can be tested on > top of v7.2-rc1 or do they need other stuff from drm-misc-next? > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Hi Linus, patches are independent and can be tested on v7.2-rc1. I've seen others patches based on drm tree so I did the same. Would switch to v7.2-rc1 if that's preferred :) Thanks, Ze Huang