[PATCH] serial: 8250_aspeed_vuart: Replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs_emit

[PATCH] serial: 8250_aspeed_vuart: Replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs_emit

[cgel.zte]

From: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@zte.com.cn>

coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show
functions:
WARNING use scnprintf or sprintf

Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf, snprintf or sprintf makes more
sense.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c
index 2350fb3bb5e4..36c39b8ea7af 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static ssize_t lpc_address_show(struct device *dev,
 	addr = (aspeed_vuart_readb(vuart, ASPEED_VUART_ADDRH) << 8) |
 		(aspeed_vuart_readb(vuart, ASPEED_VUART_ADDRL));
 
-	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "0x%x\n", addr);
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%x\n", addr);
 }
 
 static int aspeed_vuart_set_lpc_address(struct aspeed_vuart *vuart, u32 addr)
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static ssize_t sirq_show(struct device *dev,
 	reg &= ASPEED_VUART_GCRB_HOST_SIRQ_MASK;
 	reg >>= ASPEED_VUART_GCRB_HOST_SIRQ_SHIFT;
 
-	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%u\n", reg);
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", reg);
 }
 
 static int aspeed_vuart_set_sirq(struct aspeed_vuart *vuart, u32 sirq)
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static ssize_t sirq_polarity_show(struct device *dev,
 	reg = aspeed_vuart_readb(vuart, ASPEED_VUART_GCRA);
 	reg &= ASPEED_VUART_GCRA_HOST_SIRQ_POLARITY;
 
-	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%u\n", reg ? 1 : 0);
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", reg ? 1 : 0);
 }
 
 static void aspeed_vuart_set_sirq_polarity(struct aspeed_vuart *vuart,
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH] serial: 8250_aspeed_vuart: Replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs_emit

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 02:40:28AM +0000, cgel.zte at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@zte.com.cn>
> 
> coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show
> functions:
> WARNING use scnprintf or sprintf
> 
> Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf, snprintf or sprintf makes more
> sense.

Same subject and changelog comments as the staging driver change you
sent in :(