From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:47:04 +0800 (CST)
Subject: [PATCH -next] mmc: aspeed: Fix return value check in
 aspeed_sdc_probe()
In-Reply-To: <629128e7-cc91-412f-8946-668fac2eb3b9@www.fastmail.com>
References: <20190826120013.183435-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
 <20190826130343.GA23584@kadam>
 <629128e7-cc91-412f-8946-668fac2eb3b9@www.fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908270845410.2537@hadrien>
List-Id: <linux-aspeed.lists.ozlabs.org>
To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Andrew Jeffery wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2019, at 22:34, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > Fixes: 09eed7fffd33 ("mmc: Add support for the ASPEED SD controller")
> >                         ^^^^
> > When we're adding new files, could we use the prefix for the new driver
> > instead of just the subsystem?  "mmc: aspeed: Add new driver"?
> > Otherwise it's tricky to know what people want for the driver.
>
> I don't have any issue with the request, but I don't understand this last
> bit. What do you mean by "it's tricky to know what people want for the
> driver"?

There is no obvious algorithm that tells how to go from a file name to an
appropriate subject line prefix.

julia