From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ftgmac100: Disable HW checksum generation on AST2500
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:34:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b99afb6c88f00279c68979f344a15a2c200ca67e.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <071cf1eeefcbfc14633a13bc2d15ad7392987a88.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 10:14 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> I don't understand what you are saying. You reported a problem with
> IPV6 checksums generation. The HW doesn't support it. What's "not a
> matter of unsupported csum" ?
>
> Your patch uses a *deprecated* bit to tell the network stack to only do
> HW checksum generation on IPV4.
>
> This bit is deprecated for a reason, again, see skbuff.h. The right
> approach, *which the driver already does*, is to tell the stack that we
> support HW checksuming using NETIF_F_HW_CSUM, and then, in the transmit
> handler, to call skb_checksum_help() to have the SW calculate the
> checksum if it's not a supported type.
>
> This is exactly what ftgmac100_prep_tx_csum() does. It only enables HW
> checksum generation on supported types and uses skb_checksum_help()
> otherwise, supported types being protocol ETH_P_IP and IP protocol
> being raw IP, TCP and UDP.
>
> So this *should* have fallen back to SW for IPV6. So either something
> in my code there is making an incorrect assumption, or something is
> broken in skb_checksum_help() for IPV6 (which I somewhat doubt) or
> something else I can't think of, but setting a *deprecated* flag is
> definitely not the right answer, neither is completely disabling HW
> checksumming.
>
> So can you investigate what's going on a bit more closely please ? I
> can try myself, though I have very little experience with IPV6 and
> probably won't have time before next week.
I did get that piece of information from Aspeed: The HW checksum
generation is supported if:
- The length of UDP header is always 20 bytes.
- The length of TCP and IP header have 4 * N bytes (N is 5 to 15).
Now these afaik are also the protocol limits, so it *should* work.
Or am I missing something or some funky encaspulation/header format
that can be used under some circumstances ?
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191011213027.2110008-1-vijaykhemka@fb.com>
2019-10-17 1:28 ` [PATCH v2] ftgmac100: Disable HW checksum generation on AST2500 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-10-17 22:01 ` Vijay Khemka
2019-10-17 23:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-10-17 23:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2019-10-18 0:06 ` Vijay Khemka
2019-10-18 0:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-10-18 22:50 ` Vijay Khemka
2019-10-19 0:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2019-10-19 1:31 ` Vijay Khemka
2019-10-19 10:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] <20190911194453.2595021-1-vijaykhemka@fb.com>
2019-09-17 19:34 ` Vijay Khemka
2019-09-24 17:26 ` Vijay Khemka
2019-10-10 19:20 ` Vijay Khemka
2019-10-11 1:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b99afb6c88f00279c68979f344a15a2c200ca67e.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).