From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jack Dennon Subject: Re: Nasm v/s Gas Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:21:59 -0800 Sender: linux-assembly-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3DED1267.D7854F73@seasurf.net> References: <20021203120622.54680.qmail@web41113.mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: jdennon@seasurf.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: ruxyz@yahoo.com Cc: Assembly Linux I like gas, but I will listen, rather than answer. Are you trying to start a fight? Anticipating a Reply wrote: > Hi All , > > I'am a Assembly learner , working > on Linux Platform . > > I was not able to decide whether I should > learn assembly programming using NASM or > GNU-As . > > As Linux Inline assembly accepts 'gas' > syntax , I would like to know which of > the two to use . > > So I would like to know what are the > advantages and disadvantages involved in > using NASM v/s GNU-As ? > > Thanks in Advance . > > Bye, > Sarvesh > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. > visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-assembly" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html