linux-assembly.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lawrence <lawrencio@hotpop.com>
To: fmarmond@eprocess.fr
Cc: linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using asm to develop GUI under framebuffer environment
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:45:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4041442F.1010604@hotpop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1077981999.4040b32fb1541@intranet.eprocess.fr>

Hi Frederic,

Thank you very much for your comment and time. This way I can start to 
experiment with the linux framebuffer!

Best Regards,
Lawrence


fmarmond@eprocess.fr ??:

>Hi Lawrence, 
>telnet is a 'unsecure' 'old' way of connecting to a remote host. 
>I guess you are at home, so security is not the priority, and you are using 
>windows in your second host, so, the 'old' side of telnet is not a problem. 
>(plus, if you use windows, security seems not to be your priority too...) ;) 
>I must admit that I don't use ald. 
> 
>See following comments... 
> 
>Selon Lawrence <lawrencio@hotpop.com>: 
> 
>  
>
>>Hi Frederic, 
>> 
>>Thanks for your kindly reply.  I keep thinking about your inspiration  
>>these days (and that's the reason for my late reply).  Since I am not  
>>quite familiar with SSH, I tried to telnet into my linux box under MS  
>>Windows, and debug the attached framebuffer example asm file I found on 
>> 
>>http://www.nk.rim.or.jp/~jun/lxasm/exasm.tar.gz 
>> 
>>using ald.  the screen do appear rightly on the linux console, while the  
>>debugging process is shown on my telnet window. 
>> 
>>I don't know if this operation is right, as I only step over a few  
>>command, then I pass the 'continue' command to ald and let it run.  
>>    
>>
>It seems to do what you want, so it seems to be right, no? ;) 
>That's the way I suggested, with SSH. 
>  
>
>> Moreover, the example open /dev/fb0 directly, I am not sure if it is  
>>because this act that make the output rightly go into the linux console  
>>but not on my telnet screen. 
>>    
>>
>In Unixes (and so, Linux), "all is file" (the primary rule of Unix). 
>In fact, /dev/fb0 is a file that has no physical reality on disk. It is just 
>an entry in the filesystem that point to a kernel API. If you write something 
>to this 'file', in fact, it send the data to the associated driver. The driver 
>(in the kernel) can be accessed that way, very easily! There is nothing magic, 
>you can read what drivers do in the kernel sources.  
>In general, you send command to the driver with ioctl (Input/Ouput ConTroL, 
>see the related man page), and large data with regular read/writes. 
>For FrameBufer, for exemple, you send change modes request thru IOCTL, and 
>graphic data thru writes. 
> 
>The FrameBuffer acts directly on your graphic card, so, on the host that is 
>running the prog hardware. The telnet is just a terminal emulation. It a very 
>simple protocole that works in lot of TEXT termials (VT100 for exemple). 
> 
>  
>
>> 
>>Would you please be so kind as to tell me if I am wrong? 
>>    
>>
>Is what you do not what you wanted to do? If it is, you are right! ;) 
> 
>Fred 
>  
>
>> 
>>Thanks and Regards, 
>>Lawence 
>> 
>>    
>>
>>>hum, what about working with SSH ? 
>>>I think it may be the best choice! 
>>>You may also use a deported X screen (no X serveur on the computer on  
>>>which you are working for your GUI, but on an other machine on which  
>>>you can deport your screen, to debug, play with tetris and send  
>>>mails... ;) ) 
>>>If you come from windows and are not aware of the power of unix, ask  
>>>me precisions... 
>>>
>>>Fred 
>>>
>>>Lawrence wrote: 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Hi Linux Assembly Gurus, 
>>>>
>>>>I have some experience in developing a desktop environment using 
>>>>PharLap's asm toolkit.  I am very interested in doing the same thing 
>>>>under Linux. 
>>>>
>>>>Because of the GUI nature, I usually redirect the output of the debugger 
>>>>into another computer's terminal, so that the UI being debugged can  
>>>>be seen. 
>>>>
>>>>I would like to know if there is a nasm specialized debugger that can do 
>>>>such remote debugging under Linux, or are there any workaround for this 
>>>>issue. 
>>>>
>>>>Thanks and Regards, 
>>>>Lawrence 
>>>>
>>>>- 
>>>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe  
>>>>linux-assembly" in 
>>>>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
>>>>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>> 
>>    
>>
> 
> 
> 
>
>-------------------------------------------------
>This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>
>  
>



      reply	other threads:[~2004-02-29  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-25  1:59 Using asm to develop GUI under framebuffer environment Lawrence
2004-02-26  8:06 ` Frederic Marmond
     [not found]   ` <403FF536.1080807@hotpop.com>
2004-02-28 15:26     ` fmarmond
2004-02-29  1:45       ` Lawrence [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4041442F.1010604@hotpop.com \
    --to=lawrencio@hotpop.com \
    --cc=fmarmond@eprocess.fr \
    --cc=linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).