Re:

Re:

[use]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:00:48 -0700
"Joshua Hudson" <joshudson@hotmail.com> wrote:
			   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
what did you expect?

> I cannot get ahold of konst. My mail was bounced by
> a spam blocker.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

hp

Re: Re:

[Rick A. Hohensee]

In fact, it's worse than full of shit. Stallman's quibble with the Plan 9
license is the ultimate indication of what all you open source poseurs are.

Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, the sam guy, et all, have emulated
Stallman's license, which is the finest complement his finest work will
ever get, which I mentioned in l-k at the time, and he has no appreciation
for it.

Rick HohenseeB

Re:

[hp]

for instance, <man ld86>

	...
   -N	Create  a  native Linux OMAGIC output file. 
	If the contents are i386 code the binary can be either linked by
              GCC or executed by linux. If the -z option is also included the 
	linker can generate a QMAGIC executable.
	...

never tried, myself, though.


best,
	hp
---
n  mishra am Samstag, 18. Januar 2003 05:26:
> Hi all!
> This sounds slightly silly but is it possible to link the .obj
> files from one compiler to another.I have been working with bcc
> and gcc and was wondering if it was possible to link files created
> in one compiler for eg bcc to the other for eg gcc.
> I tried to create a obj file in bcc and load it using ld but it
> said the file format was not recognisable.
> Also how do you execute a binary file created using as86 and the
> -b option.
> Thanks in advance.
> mishra.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-assembly"
> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Linux,Assembly,Forth: http://www.lxhp.in-berlin.de/index-lx.shtml en/de
  >> clf -at- lxhp -dot- in-berlin -dot- de <<

(unknown),

[sabancia]

Hi everyone,
I am a computer engineering student in Turkey. I came across your web site while
I was searching how to generate Intel 80x86 assembly code of a C file by using
gcc. I compiled my C code (a5.c) like this:
gcc -S a5.c -o a5.s
but the a5.s output file contains the assembly code in AT&T syntax.

I wanted to learn what I should do to get the code generated in Intel 80x86
syntax, if it's possible.

Thanks in advance for your help.
Best Regards..

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Re:

[Frank Kotler]

sabancia@itu.edu.tr wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am a computer engineering student in Turkey. I came across your web site while
> I was searching how to generate Intel 80x86 assembly code of a C file by using
> gcc. I compiled my C code (a5.c) like this:
> gcc -S a5.c -o a5.s
> but the a5.s output file contains the assembly code in AT&T syntax.
> 
> I wanted to learn what I should do to get the code generated in Intel 80x86
> syntax, if it's possible.

Adding "-masm=intel" will (may) get you closer. I can't figure out how 
to get it to do the "noprefix" part of ".intel_syntax noprefix", so I 
still get the "%"s. You might be better off to let gcc generate at&t 
syntax and convert to Intel with "intel2gas" (which works either way) or 
"a2i". You might still have to do some "hand editing".

Best,
Frank