linux-assembly.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Philipp Kohlbecher <pk031698@uni-greifswald.de>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21.1] i386: save registers before intra-privilege syscall
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:33:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <464CE653.4020006@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464CE4CA.8000704@uni-greifswald.de>

Philipp Kohlbecher wrote:
> 
> I don't know of any problems this causes. The kernel needs to be aware
> of the fact that the xss and esp fields of the pt_regs struct may
> contain wrong values anyway, as hardware interrupts arriving while the
> CPU is in kernel mode would also lead to this condition.
> The file include/asm-i386/processor.h contains a comment to that effect
> (lines 483-492).
> With kernel_execve we can predict this, however, and account for it.
> (This may be superfluous, but I don't think it hurts and it might
> prevent future errors.)
> 

... and it may *cause* future errors by making it harder to find bugs, too.

In other words, your patch doesn't actually fix anything, it *masks*
potential bugs which would also be triggered by interrupts in kernel
mode.  This is bad.

You realize you just make a distinction between synchronous and
asynchronous events, such that your patch means that only asynchronous
events would catch the bugs you mask.  This makes bug hunting much harder.

If anything it would be better to poison those fields so that we can
smoke out anything that trusts them.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-17 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-17 22:06 [PATCH 2.6.21.1] i386: save registers before intra-privilege syscall Philipp Kohlbecher
2007-05-17 22:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-17 23:27   ` Philipp Kohlbecher
2007-05-17 23:33     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-05-18  8:32       ` Philipp Kohlbecher
2007-05-18 22:41         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-18 23:08           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-21 10:48           ` Philipp Kohlbecher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=464CE653.4020006@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pk031698@uni-greifswald.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).