From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "S kris" <kris_bs@hotmail.com>
Subject: Naked Functions
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 19:43:59 +0530
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <Law14-F517jvXRGwmHi0000fee3@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <gcc-return-75108-gcc=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gcc-unsubscribe-gcc=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
List-Id: <linux-assembly.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: linux-assembly@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

I have come across some MS C code which uses 'naked' functions. How can I 
achieve a similar effect with GNU toolchain. I do not want to rewrite the 
code in assembly .s file and would prefer to do simple modifications to make 
it work with Linux.

Is the macro __attribute__((naked)) valid for the above purpose?
If not, what are the methods to generate the code for functions without its 
prolog and epilog code (naked functions) under Linux?
Is prolog and epilog  code generated by both MS tools and GNU tools 
(compilers) are same?

Please clarify the above queries.

Thanks in advance.

--Kris

_________________________________________________________________
Reconnect with old pals. Relive the happy times. 
http://www.batchmates.com/msn.asp With just one click.