public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "chuli" <chul@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: 'Steve Grubb' <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: 'linux-audit' <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: [Patch]Fix the bug of using "-S syscall -a list, action", no errors will be reported.
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:38:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000901c8f2ae$209adb30$958da70a@truly> (raw)

Hi Steve,

  When I use "-a user,always -S open", errors will be reported. But when I use
"-S open -a user,always", no errors will report. There is no corresponding
codes to deal with the later format.

  Here is my patch. Hope for your opinion about such modification.
  (I move the code for checking "task" list to the handle_request().)

Signed-off-by: Chu Li <chul@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/src/auditctl.c b/src/auditctl.c
index d740509..9cc3df0 100755
--- a/src/auditctl.c
+++ b/src/auditctl.c
@@ -532,52 +532,40 @@ static int setopt(int count, char *vars[])
 		retval = -2;
 		break;
         case 'a':
-		if (strstr(optarg, "task") && audit_syscalladded) {
+		rc = audit_rule_setup(optarg, &add, &action);
+		if (rc == 3) {
+			fprintf(stderr,
+			"Multiple rule insert/delete operations are not allowed\n");
+			retval = -1;
+		} else if (rc == 2) {
 			fprintf(stderr,
-				"Syscall auditing requested for task list\n");
+			"Append rule - bad keyword %s\n",
+			optarg);
 			retval = -1;
-		} else {
-			rc = audit_rule_setup(optarg, &add, &action);
-			if (rc == 3) {
-				fprintf(stderr,
-		"Multiple rule insert/delete operations are not allowed\n");
-				retval = -1;
-			} else if (rc == 2) {
-				fprintf(stderr,
-					"Append rule - bad keyword %s\n",
-					optarg);
-				retval = -1;
-			} else if (rc == 1) {
-				fprintf(stderr,
-				    "Append rule - possible is deprecated\n");
-				return -3; /* deprecated - eat it */
-			} else
-				retval = 1; /* success - please send */
-		}
+		} else if (rc == 1) {
+			fprintf(stderr,
+		 	"Append rule - possible is deprecated\n");
+			return -3; /* deprecated - eat it */
+		} else
+			retval = 1; /* success - please send */
 		break;
         case 'A':
-		if (strstr(optarg, "task") && audit_syscalladded) {
-			fprintf(stderr,
-			   "Error: syscall auditing requested for task list\n");
+		rc = audit_rule_setup(optarg, &add, &action);
+		if (rc == 3) {
+			fprintf(stderr,
+			"Multiple rule insert/delete operations are not allowed\n");
 			retval = -1;
+		} else if (rc == 2) {
+			fprintf(stderr,
+			"Add rule - bad keyword %s\n", optarg);
+			retval = -1;
+		} else if (rc == 1) {
+			fprintf(stderr,
+			"Append rule - possible is deprecated\n");
+			return -3; /* deprecated - eat it */
 		} else {
-			rc = audit_rule_setup(optarg, &add, &action);
-			if (rc == 3) {
-				fprintf(stderr,
-		"Multiple rule insert/delete operations are not allowed\n");
-				retval = -1;
-			} else if (rc == 2) {
-				fprintf(stderr,
-				"Add rule - bad keyword %s\n", optarg);
-				retval = -1;
-			} else if (rc == 1) {
-				fprintf(stderr,
-				    "Append rule - possible is deprecated\n");
-				return -3; /* deprecated - eat it */
-			} else {
-				add |= AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND;
-				retval = 1; /* success - please send */
-			}
+			add |= AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND;
+			retval = 1; /* success - please send */
 		}
 		break;
         case 'd':
@@ -1167,6 +1155,27 @@ static int handle_request(int status)
 					audit_rule_syscallbyname_data(
 							rule_new, "all");
 			}
+			if(audit_syscalladded == 1){
+				if (((add & (AUDIT_FILTER_MASK|AUDIT_FILTER_UNSET)) ==
+					AUDIT_FILTER_TASK || (del &
+					(AUDIT_FILTER_MASK|AUDIT_FILTER_UNSET)) ==
+					AUDIT_FILTER_TASK)) {
+					fprintf(stderr,
+					"Error: syscall auditing being added to task list\n");
+					return -1;
+				} else if (((add & (AUDIT_FILTER_MASK|AUDIT_FILTER_UNSET)) ==
+					AUDIT_FILTER_USER || (del &
+					(AUDIT_FILTER_MASK|AUDIT_FILTER_UNSET)) ==
+					AUDIT_FILTER_USER)) {
+					fprintf(stderr,
+					"Error: syscall auditing being added to user list\n");
+					return -1;
+				} else if (exclude) {
+					fprintf(stderr,
+					"Error: syscall auditing cannot be put on exclude list\n");
+					return -1;
+				}
+			}
 			if (which == OLD) {
 				rc = audit_add_rule(fd, &rule, add, action);
 			} else {

Regards
Chu Li

             reply	other threads:[~2008-07-31  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-31  1:38 chuli [this message]
2008-08-05  0:18 ` [Patch]Fix the bug of using "-S syscall -a list, action", no errors will be reported Steve Grubb
2008-08-06  7:27   ` Chu Li
2008-08-06  8:51     ` Chu Li
2008-08-06 16:57     ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000901c8f2ae$209adb30$958da70a@truly' \
    --to=chul@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox