From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Richard Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Lost events during boot
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:05:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10800585.H1D5vqFXko@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhRbS0Zc+ZGSvLThuUV4b8PtvbFkpMoYqd2C4GMZRzK+dQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, March 20, 2017 8:08:27 AM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hello Richard and Paul,
> >
> > I was going to do a blog write up about booting the system with
> > audit_backlog_limit=8192 for STIG users and have stumbled on to a mystery.
> > The kernel initializes the variable to 64 at power on. During boot, if
> > audit == 1, then it holds events in the hopes that an audit daemon will
> > show up later and drain all the events. Anything over 64 events should
> > fall off the end and increment the lost counter and put a notice in
> > syslog.
> >
> > However, when booting with audit_backlog_limit=8192, as soon as I log in I
> > run "auditctl -s" I can see I've lost 73 events. The I run "aureport
> > --start boot" and I see 644 total events. This is nowhere near the 8192
> > limit that I asked for. So, why am I losing events?
> >
> > Additionally, I checked the logs and there is absolutely no message in
> > syslog showing that I've lost events. This is with failure mode set to 1
> > - which is default at power on. And this is in spite of the the fact that
> > the source code seems to show that it should have printk'ed something.
> >
> > Any ideas? Can you replicate this finding?
>
> It's funny, I just noticed this for the first time on Friday (the
> exact same lost count too), although it was a development kernel build
> with a *heavily* modified audit subsystem so I just assumed I had
> broken something with the queuing, the lost counter, or both. It's
> possible I still may have broken something in the v4.10 queue rework,
> or something broke a long time ago and we are just noticing it now.
>
> First off, can you create a GitHub issue for this
Lost events during boot #38.
> and include your kernel build (e.g. 'uname -r')?
# uname -r
4.9.13-101.fc24.x86_64
> Second, if you are seeing this on a +v4.10 kernel, do you see the same
> results with a +v4.9 kernel?
Yes, and I tried a 4.8.10 and see it there as well.
I then checked a 3.10 RHEL 7 kernel and don't see any lost events and that
even has a backlog_limit of the default of 64.
I then found a system with a 4.5.5 kernel and it also was losing events.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-20 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-20 1:46 Lost events during boot Steve Grubb
2017-03-20 12:08 ` Paul Moore
2017-03-20 14:44 ` Paul Moore
2017-03-20 14:55 ` Paul Moore
2017-03-20 15:08 ` Steve Grubb
2017-03-21 8:04 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2017-03-21 11:30 ` Paul Moore
2017-03-20 15:05 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2017-03-20 19:25 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10800585.H1D5vqFXko@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox