From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Antill <jantill@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: audit 1.2.2 released
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:16:29 -0400
Message-ID: <1148570190.8828.12.camel@code.and.org>
References: <200605121726.32952.sgrubb@redhat.com>	<4469F585.6030108@hp.com>
	<200605161323.32162.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<200605221331.54945.sgrubb@redhat.com>	<4473374C.8030902@us.ibm.com>
	<44738AA0.50006@us.ibm.com> <44739521.7080602@hp.com>
	<4474B7B2.6030601@us.ibm.com> <1148504311.8828.6.camel@code.and.org>
	<4475B5B2.3010408@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0765459947=="
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
Received: from mail.and.org (vpn83-122.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.122])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4PFGZLw029501
	for <linux-audit@redhat.com>; Thu, 25 May 2006 11:16:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4475B5B2.3010408@us.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com


--===============0765459947==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-m88DWfoPzPatBWXWfyFY"


--=-m88DWfoPzPatBWXWfyFY
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 08:48 -0500, Michael C Thompson wrote:

> Do you mean to say that embedded audit_log_user_message() inside a loop=20
> changes it's return code?

 Sorry, my explanation probably wasn't clear.
 It changes from the first to the second invocation, the first is always
-1 the second is always 0 (on boot, only, after boot the first succeeds
as well).


int i;
for (i=3D0; i<2; i++) {
	rc =3D audit_log_user_message();
}

> Is that code sample correct?

 It is now, yes.

--=20
James Antill - <james.antill@redhat.com>
> * What is the penalty for using RHEL without paying?
We subscribe them to memo-list. -- Bill Nottingham

--=-m88DWfoPzPatBWXWfyFY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEdcpN11eXTEMrxtQRAprsAKC8Wrh9KSeHdYILa6C47HbvtomInwCfYTIK
FFc7iDx32Dtx7UHuOQjpSIw=
=NWsF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-m88DWfoPzPatBWXWfyFY--


--===============0765459947==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


--===============0765459947==--