From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187C5C433B4 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 985B66052B for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:38:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 985B66052B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1621535927; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=AJlokpQtbccAWqTZHKefoxkKLqKJWGvs2KM2xDLU/88=; b=BbZKrenSPnZGJzK/wDXBfAivauDvtJ/CI9cVJFczQjQ3WLW7bsasZPu/e1mPo2YTzX39o6 to1pmvf8c418Z+V/uhtcTap3y1KjPJ7fwDHwfdLLW/ravfG5WRt7VZ0k19Dbc40dYtN2F9 X+BbWdHFWXlZfLiDgELh65pCEiPw1so= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-229-JTmCEJqpOKud6ZglkVeXXw-1; Thu, 20 May 2021 14:38:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JTmCEJqpOKud6ZglkVeXXw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958AB6D249; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 324691B480; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA28944A5D; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 14KIcbi1006335 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 14:38:37 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 8E3105D9DC; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x2.localnet (ovpn-115-240.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.115.240]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436245D9CC; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:38:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Steve Grubb To: Linux Audit Subject: Re: augenrules: -F missing operation for -k Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 14:38:30 -0400 Message-ID: <11753387.O9o76ZdvQC@x2> Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <2102583.irdbgypaU6@x2> References: <2102583.irdbgypaU6@x2> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-loop: linux-audit@redhat.com X-BeenThere: linux-audit@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: Linux Audit Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, On Thursday, May 20, 2021 12:08:56 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote: > On Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:56:00 AM EDT warron.french wrote: > > Does anybody know what this error means? > > augenrules: -F missing operation for -k > > > > I cannot figure out what rule is causing this, so I need a little > > more context to figure out what to look for in my *.rules files under > > /etc/audit/rules.d. > > It means there is no value associated with a -F name=value construct. Actually, I misspoke. In the name=vale portion, it didn't find the '=' where one was expected. Since it mentions '-k', you might be mixing watch syntax with syscall syntax. -k keyname is valid with watches. For syscalls its -F key=keyname. -Steve > I am thinking syslog should have the line number in the rules where this > comes from. Do you a -k some where that doesn't look right? -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit