From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch 058/209] audit: rework execve audit Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:55:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1185573344.15205.54.camel@lappy> References: <200707190848.l6J8mFQf023098@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <200707271613.10753.sgrubb@redhat.com> <1185569045.15205.49.camel@lappy> <200707271657.40399.sgrubb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200707271657.40399.sgrubb@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Steve Grubb Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, aaw@google.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:57 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > I don't know of anything special its a fully updated rawhide machine. I am not > running any tests, this is at the prompt in runlevel 3. I have audit=1 as a > boot parameter in grub.conf and very simple audit rules for that machine: > > -D > -b 256 > -a exit,always -S sethostname > -w /etc/selinux/config > > which is not exotic. I'm feeling dumb,.. on fedora 7 userland I do: [root@opteron ~]# auditctl -D No rules [root@opteron ~]# auditctl -b 256 AUDIT_STATUS: enabled=0 flag=1 pid=0 rate_limit=0 backlog_limit=256 lost=0 backlog=0 [root@opteron ~]# auditctl -a exit,always -S sethostname Error sending add rule request (Invalid argument) man auditctl seems to suggest that is a valid command.