From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Paris Subject: Re: Kernel audit output is inconsistent, hard to parse Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:39:06 -0500 Message-ID: <1201711146.2801.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <479FAF24.8050109@redhat.com> <200801300921.34357.sgrubb@redhat.com> <200801301034.00474.paul.moore@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200801301034.00474.paul.moore@hp.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Paul Moore Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:34 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wednesday 30 January 2008 9:21:34 am Steve Grubb wrote: > > This is what we've done with user space. As for the kernel, essentially > > there is no maintainer or anyone interested in doing audit work. I pretty > > much have to force people to touch it. So, good luck getting kernel work > > done. > > I thought you/Eric/Al were the maintainer(s)? No? Okay, fine. Depends what the work is. I've been paying close attention and fixing problems that creep up around audit even if a bit slow getting those pushed to linus sometimes. We've got a lot of changes/fixes going into the new tree. Do I regularly just rewrite stuff to make it pretty/better? No. Lately its been all bug fix, no general 'make me better' work. And although interesting, this isn't 'broken', so it is the number one thing on my infinitely long list of stuff to look at... -Eric