From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Klaus Heinrich Kiwi <klausk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: audit 1.7.4 released
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 13:57:28 -0300
Message-ID: <1211907448.17805.1.camel@klausk.br.ibm.com>
References: <200805191450.06153.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<1211903431.6568.41.camel@homeserver>
	<200805271210.04007.sgrubb@redhat.com>
	<1211904978.6568.53.camel@homeserver>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1211904978.6568.53.camel@homeserver>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
Cc: Linux Audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 11:16 -0500, LC Bruzenak wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 12:10 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> ...
> > > Once we aggregate these would be tough to separate.
> > 
> > That is why we added the node field. :)  You should probably enable it with 
> > the name_format option.
> 
> I think I do have it:
> 
> [root@hugo audit]# grep name_format /etc/audit/auditd.conf
> name_format = hostname

Isn't the audit dispatcher's role of adding the node name in the record?
If so, only records going through the audispd would have this field.

 -K

-- 
Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
Security Development - IBM Linux Technology Center