From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: LC Bruzenak Subject: audit_log_user_message question Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:56:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1211910963.6568.73.camel@homeserver> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4RHuU9M030104 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 13:56:30 -0400 Received: from magi (rrcs-24-242-137-197.sw.biz.rr.com [24.242.137.197]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4RHuJe8031384 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 13:56:19 -0400 Received: from [24.242.137.194] (helo=[192.168.30.40]) by magi with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1K13O2-0007HZ-Pt for linux-audit@redhat.com; Tue, 27 May 2008 12:55:02 -0500 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Linux Audit List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com In looking at the user application audit I'm wondering why there is a "hostname" field there? I understand the obvious answer but would think I'd trust the auditd or audispd more than an application for the hostname answer, and those would be consistent. Thx, LCB. -- LC (Lenny) Bruzenak lenny@magitekltd.com