From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: John Dennis <jdennis@redhat.com>
Cc: William Kelly <wkelly@rackspace.com>,
Bret Piatt <bret.piatt@rackspace.com>,
linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:11:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1218571902.3540.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A1EB72.6070607@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 15:58 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> So many people have complained about this; I do not understand the
> resistance to fixing it. The argument it would break something which
> is broken to begin with does not seem like a reasonable justification
> to me. The sooner it's fixed the better IMHO.
Show me the code and I'll start trying to fix the kernel based on that
code as best we can. But before you start read over the article
Can user-space bugs be kernel regressions?
http://lwn.net/Articles/292143/
As soon as you grasp that article send me the code and we'll work
together to fix this problem!
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-12 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-12 17:49 get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields Jonathan Kelly
2008-08-12 18:05 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-08-12 18:52 ` John Dennis
2008-08-12 19:02 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-08-12 18:16 ` John Dennis
2008-08-12 21:13 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-12 22:10 ` Matthew Booth
2008-08-12 23:01 ` Eric Paris
2008-08-12 19:16 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-12 19:58 ` John Dennis
2008-08-12 20:11 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2008-08-12 20:32 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-12 21:09 ` John Dennis
2008-08-12 21:24 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-12 22:37 ` John Dennis
2008-08-13 0:33 ` Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
2008-08-13 15:09 ` Eric Paris
2008-08-13 16:25 ` Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
2008-08-13 17:02 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-13 17:30 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-08-13 18:49 ` Linda Knippers
2008-08-13 19:58 ` John Dennis
2008-08-14 18:25 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-08-15 13:58 ` Matteo Michelini
2008-08-15 14:10 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-15 15:27 ` Matteo Michelini
2008-08-15 14:15 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-08-13 16:29 ` John Dennis
2008-08-13 22:35 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-08-12 20:57 ` John Dennis
2008-08-12 21:18 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-12 21:40 ` John Dennis
2008-08-12 21:53 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-12 22:11 ` John Dennis
2008-08-12 22:46 ` Steve Grubb
2008-08-12 22:59 ` Eric Paris
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-13 16:57 Jonathan Kelly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1218571902.3540.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=bret.piatt@rackspace.com \
--cc=jdennis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=wkelly@rackspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox