From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Performance of libauparse
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:15:27 -0400
Message-ID: <1222866927.28251.115.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <48E22AC8.8010906@redhat.com>  <48E27B7E.3050000@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <48E27B7E.3050000@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: John Dennis <jdennis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 15:18 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> Eric likes to point out we can't change the 
> kernel

Close, but not quite.  I say we can't change the kernel without complete
backwards compatibility.  Show me the right solution and we can get
there, we just can't throw away what's already there.

-Eric