From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
Subject: Re: ausearch on aggregation - syscall difference
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:30:08 -0500
Message-ID: <1224869408.9388.21.camel@homeserver>
References: <1224868121.9388.8.camel@homeserver>
	<200810241316.21804.sgrubb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200810241316.21804.sgrubb@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 13:16 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday 24 October 2008 13:08:41 LC Bruzenak wrote:
> > Note that the syscall is listed differently.
> 
> Interesting.
> 
> 
> > This is using the 1.7.7 code (on F9), I have not yet moved over to 1.7.8
> > in case it may be fixed there.
> 
> Nope...nothing was changed there to fix it. This is the first I'd heard of the 
> problem..Can you show me the raw record?
> 
> ausearch -ts today -a 10038 --raw
> 
> Thanks,
> -Steve
> 
[root@dell1 ~]# ausyscall 102
getuid
[root@dell1 ~]# ausyscall i386 102
socketcall

-- 
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny@magitekltd.com