From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: LC Bruzenak Subject: Re: ausearch on aggregation - syscall difference Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:38:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1224873525.9388.25.camel@homeserver> References: <1224868121.9388.8.camel@homeserver> <490213B2.3040701@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <490213B2.3040701@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: John Dennis Cc: Linux Audit List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 14:28 -0400, John Dennis wrote: > > > This problem occurs because ausearch naively assumes the log data it's > parsing originated on the same machine it's running on. Instead of > reading the arch from the audit record it calls audit_detect_machine() > which calls uname(). It then uses the machine arch it found with uname() > to interpret the syscall number. Auparse has the same problem. > The audit-viewer gets the right syscall for the event's arch. LCB. -- LC (Lenny) Bruzenak lenny@magitekltd.com