From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] fixing audit rule ordering mess, part 1
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:10:44 -0500
Message-ID: <1229548244.3384.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <E1LCoiI-0000Eu-Ty@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<1229538488.3384.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20081217205902.GH28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20081217205902.GH28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 20:59 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:28:08PM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> 
> > I don't see why prio is only important on AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT.  Couldn't I
> > end up with stupidity with entry,never  ?
> 
> 
> AUDIT_WATCH and AUDIT_INODE can live only on exit chain.  I.e. we don't have
> that problem - other chains sit on the lists of their own and there the
> list ordering itself takes care of everything.  Exit chain has parts in
> sitting in hash instead of the primary list.

Makes perfect sense.  They all look good to me.

-Eric