From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: LC Bruzenak Subject: arch question in rules Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:01:04 -0500 Message-ID: <1239120064.30677.21.camel@homeserver> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n37GDCRk000614 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:13:12 -0400 Received: from mail.magitekltd.com (rrcs-24-242-137-197.sw.biz.rr.com [24.242.137.197]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n37G151G030492 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:01:06 -0400 Received: from [24.242.137.194] (helo=[192.168.30.40]) by mail.magitekltd.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LrDi8-0004YS-0k for linux-audit@redhat.com; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:59:40 -0500 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Linux Audit List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com Q: Should I remove the arch=b32 audit rules if all machines are 64-bit? Previously we had both; loaded same ruleset everywhere. Thx, LCB. -- LC (Lenny) Bruzenak lenny@magitekltd.com